<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/27/narrow-supreme-court-ruling-allows-sec-to-obtain-disgorgement-but-leaves-questions-unresolved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 11:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Narrow Supreme Court Ruling Allows SEC to Obtain Disgorgement, But Leaves Questions Unresolved</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/27/narrow-supreme-court-ruling-allows-sec-to-obtain-disgorgement-but-leaves-questions-unresolved/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=narrow-supreme-court-ruling-allows-sec-to-obtain-disgorgement-but-leaves-questions-unresolved</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/27/narrow-supreme-court-ruling-allows-sec-to-obtain-disgorgement-but-leaves-questions-unresolved/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 11:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disgorgement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=182383?d=20260724162441EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overview On June 4, 2026, the Supreme Court in Sripetch v. SEC unanimously held that the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) need not prove that investors suffered a pecuniary loss before obtaining disgorgement. In doing so, the Court resolved a circuit split between the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Caitlyn Campbell, John Nowak, and Paul Helms, McDermott Will & Schulte, on Monday, July 27, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.mcdermottlaw.com/people/campbell-caitlyn-m/">Caitlyn Campbell</a>, <a href="https://www.mcdermottlaw.com/people/john-p-nowak/">John Nowak</a>, and <a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://www.mcdermottlaw.com/people/helms-paul/">Paul Helms</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> are Partners at McDermott Will &amp; Schulte. This post is based on a McDermott memorandum by Ms. Campbell, Mr. Nowak, and Mr. Helms, and </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://www.mcdermottlaw.com/people/gabriel-j-gross/">Gabriel Gross</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;">.</span></p>
</div></hgroup><h2>Overview</h2>
<p>On June 4, 2026, the Supreme Court in Sripetch v. SEC unanimously held that the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) need not prove that investors suffered a pecuniary loss before obtaining disgorgement. In doing so, the Court resolved a circuit split between the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (both of which permitted disgorgement absent proof of investor losses) and the Second Circuit (which required such a showing). The Supreme Court’s decision, however, was notably narrow and left unresolved several significant questions concerning the scope and constitutional status of the SEC’s disgorgement authority, creating investigation and litigation opportunities for defendants.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/27/narrow-supreme-court-ruling-allows-sec-to-obtain-disgorgement-but-leaves-questions-unresolved/#more-182383" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Narrow Supreme Court Ruling Allows SEC to Obtain Disgorgement, But Leaves Questions Unresolved">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/07/27/narrow-supreme-court-ruling-allows-sec-to-obtain-disgorgement-but-leaves-questions-unresolved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
