<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/09/beyond-the-filing-calendar-the-questions-boards-must-ask-before-changing-reporting-cadence-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 13:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Beyond the Filing Calendar: The Questions Boards Must Ask Before Changing Reporting Cadence</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/09/beyond-the-filing-calendar-the-questions-boards-must-ask-before-changing-reporting-cadence-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=beyond-the-filing-calendar-the-questions-boards-must-ask-before-changing-reporting-cadence-2</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/09/beyond-the-filing-calendar-the-questions-boards-must-ask-before-changing-reporting-cadence-2/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 11:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Company Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=182998?d=20260807161544EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many companies may soon face a genuinely consequential reporting decision if the SEC finalizes its semiannual reporting proposal substantially as issued. The question is no longer hypothetical, and it is no longer distant. The SEC&#8217;s public comment period on the proposal closed on July 6, 2026, and the Wall Street Journal has reported it drew [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Neri Bukspan and Marc Siegel, Metrix Advisory LLC, on Sunday, August 9, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Neri Bukspan and Marc Siegel are Founders and Executive Advisors at Metrix Advisory LLC. This post is based on their Metrix Advisory memorandum.</span></p>
</div></hgroup><div class="box"></p>
<p><strong>More than 200,000 comment letters – among the strongest in the SEC&#8217;s history</strong>. According to the <a href="https://www.wsj.com/finance/regulation/sec-quarterly-earnings-reports-complaints-2979d5a0">Wall Street Journal</a>, the SEC appears likely to move forward with its <a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/2026/05/s7-2026-15">semiannual reporting proposal</a> despite the significant number of opposing letters it has received. Though the Commission itself has only said it received a large number of comments and was still posting them.</p>
<p>Few rulemakings in recent memory have arrived at their <strong>board-level decision point carrying this much friction, and this much consequence.</strong> <a href="https://www.metrixadvisory.com/">Metrix Advisory</a> submitted its <a href="https://bit.ly/4pJc4Gu">own comment letter on the proposal</a>. This briefing translates the considerations raised there into a practical framework for board and audit committee decision-making.</p>
<p></div>
<p>Many companies may soon face a genuinely consequential reporting decision if the SEC finalizes its semiannual reporting proposal substantially as issued. The question is no longer hypothetical, and it is no longer distant. The SEC&#8217;s public comment period on the proposal closed on July 6, 2026, and the <a href="https://www.wsj.com/finance/regulation/sec-quarterly-earnings-reports-complaints-2979d5a0">Wall Street Journa</a>l has reported it drew more than 200,000 letters – <strong>among the strongest opposition in the SEC&#8217;s history</strong>, with the overwhelming majority opposed to the change. Despite that opposition, the <a href="https://www.wsj.com/finance/regulation/sec-quarterly-earnings-reports-complaints-2979d5a0">Wall Street Journal has reported</a> that the SEC appears likely to move forward with the proposal in some form.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/09/beyond-the-filing-calendar-the-questions-boards-must-ask-before-changing-reporting-cadence-2/#more-182998" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Beyond the Filing Calendar: The Questions Boards Must Ask Before Changing Reporting Cadence">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/09/beyond-the-filing-calendar-the-questions-boards-must-ask-before-changing-reporting-cadence-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
