<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/10/staying-alive-iss-continues-its-influence-on-2026-voting-outcomes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 13:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Staying Alive: ISS Continues Its Influence on 2026 Voting Outcomes</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/10/staying-alive-iss-continues-its-influence-on-2026-voting-outcomes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=staying-alive-iss-continues-its-influence-on-2026-voting-outcomes</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/10/staying-alive-iss-continues-its-influence-on-2026-voting-outcomes/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 11:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Shareholder Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder Voting Outcomes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=182935?d=20260807161856EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite regulatory pressures and competition from AI-enabled proxy voting systems, adverse recommendations from Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) continued to influence vote outcomes during the 2026 proxy season. When ISS recommended against management, investor opposition often matched or exceeded prior levels, especially in categories where ISS issued fewer adverse recommendations overall. Therefore, companies still need to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Martha Carter and Sydney Carlock, Teneo, on Monday, August 10, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.teneo.com/person/martha-carter/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Martha Carter</a> is the Vice Chairman and Head of Governance and Sustainability and <a href="https://www.teneo.com/person/sydney-carlock/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Sydney Carlock</a> is a Managing Director at Teneo. This post is based on a Teneo memorandum by Ms. Carter, Ms. Carlock, <a href="https://www.teneo.com/person/matt-filosa/">Matt Filosa</a>, <a href="https://www.teneo.com/person/sean-quinn/">Sean Quinn</a>, and <a href="https://www.teneo.com/person/diana-lee/">Diana Lee</a>, all at Teneo.</p>
</div></hgroup><p><strong>Despite regulatory pressures and competition from AI-enabled proxy voting systems, adverse recommendations from Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) continued to influence vote outcomes during the 2026 proxy season.</strong></p>
<p>When ISS recommended against management, investor opposition often matched or exceeded prior levels, especially in categories where ISS issued fewer adverse recommendations overall. Therefore, companies still need to pay close attention to ISS policies and potential recommendations as they prepare for Fall investor engagement and the 2027 proxy season.</p>
<p>ISS has faced no shortage of challenges in recent months: President Trump&#8217;s December Executive Order targeting core elements of its business model, lawsuits from multiple state attorneys general and the adoption of AI-enabled proxy voting tools by J.P. Morgan and Wells Fargo. These developments raised the question of whether ISS&#8217; long-standing influence over vote results was beginning to fade.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/10/staying-alive-iss-continues-its-influence-on-2026-voting-outcomes/#more-182935" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Staying Alive: ISS Continues Its Influence on 2026 Voting Outcomes">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/10/staying-alive-iss-continues-its-influence-on-2026-voting-outcomes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
