<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/25/seven-questions-boards-should-ask-after-the-2026-proxy-season/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Seven Questions Boards Should Ask After the 2026 Proxy Season</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/25/seven-questions-boards-should-ask-after-the-2026-proxy-season/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=seven-questions-boards-should-ask-after-the-2026-proxy-season</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/25/seven-questions-boards-should-ask-after-the-2026-proxy-season/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2026 proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investor Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewardship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=183439?d=20260824162444EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proxy landscape is becoming more complex and less predictable. In brief Regulatory and stewardship shifts are making investor signals harder to read and proxy voting outcomes harder to predict. Boards may need to evaluate whether their oversight structures and disclosures reflect growing expectations around AI governance. Directors should reassess investor engagement strategies, governance practices [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Lee Henderson and Jamie Smith, EY, on Tuesday, August 25, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.ey.com/en_us/people/lee-henderson" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&amp;q=https://www.ey.com/en_us/people/lee-henderson&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1758646155033000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0ya2DwcSW76Nwx0FJ6jh4T">Lee Henderson</a> is the Center for Board Matters Leader and <a href="https://www.ey.com/en_us/people/jamie-c-smith" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&amp;q=https://www.ey.com/en_us/people/jamie-c-smith&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1758646155033000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1qEKLOBNzECCy44vKXItBp">Jamie Smith</a> is the Center for Board Matters Director at EY. This post is based on their EY memorandum.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The proxy landscape is becoming more complex and less predictable.</p>
<h3>In brief</h3>
<ul>
<li>Regulatory and stewardship shifts are making investor signals harder to read and proxy voting outcomes harder to predict.</li>
<li>Boards may need to evaluate whether their oversight structures and disclosures reflect growing expectations around AI governance.</li>
<li>Directors should reassess investor engagement strategies, governance practices and board readiness for a rapidly evolving environment.</li>
</ul>
<p>Headline voting results from the 2026 proxy season reflect relative calm: continued high support for directors, hardly any failed say-on-pay votes and a sharp decline in shareholder proposals reaching the ballot. Yet those results mask a more complex reality.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/25/seven-questions-boards-should-ask-after-the-2026-proxy-season/#more-183439" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Seven Questions Boards Should Ask After the 2026 Proxy Season">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/08/25/seven-questions-boards-should-ask-after-the-2026-proxy-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
