<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/10/02/corporate-redomiciliation-to-texas-continues-despite-proxy-advisor-scrutiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 11:32:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.11</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Corporate Redomiciliation to Texas Continues Despite Proxy Advisor Scrutiny</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/10/02/corporate-redomiciliation-to-texas-continues-despite-proxy-advisor-scrutiny/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=corporate-redomiciliation-to-texas-continues-despite-proxy-advisor-scrutiny</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/10/02/corporate-redomiciliation-to-texas-continues-despite-proxy-advisor-scrutiny/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 11:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy Advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=184057?d=20261001162516EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KEY TAKEAWAYS Redomiciliation to Texas was on the rise in 2026. Recent Texas legal reforms and business court infrastructure have made the state an attractive alternative to Delaware for corporate domiciles. Proxy advisors remain skeptical of domicile moves to Texas. ISS and Glass Lewis have focused on concerns about loss of shareholder leverage, an untested [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Chris Brindisi and Ryan Peterson, Pay Governance LLC, on Friday, October 2, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Chris Brindisi is a Partner and Ryan Peterson is a Consultant at Pay Governance LLC. This post is based on their Pay Governance memorandum.</span></p>
</div></hgroup><p>KEY TAKEAWAYS</p>
<ul>
<li>Redomiciliation to Texas was on the rise in 2026. Recent Texas legal reforms and business court infrastructure have made the state an attractive alternative to Delaware for corporate domiciles.</li>
<li>Proxy advisors remain skeptical of domicile moves to Texas. ISS and Glass Lewis have focused on concerns about loss of shareholder leverage, an untested legal framework, potential dilution of shareholder rights, and the lack of clear company-specific rationale when opposing proposals to move domicile to Texas.</li>
<li>Major institutional investors have been receptive to Texas redomiciliation. BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard supported most of the proposals to redomicile in Texas during the 2026 proxy season.</li>
<li>Texas redomiciliation proposals have generally passed but not overwhelmingly. Approximately 80% of 2026 Texas redomiciliation proposals have passed to date despite proxy advisor opposition, with support levels varying meaningfully across companies.</li>
<li>Company-specific context matters. Outlier results suggest that domicile history, controlled company status, vote thresholds, and prior shareholder dissatisfaction—particularly around executive compensation—can impact outcomes.</li>
<li>Compensation committees should be prepared for heightened governance scrutiny following domicile moves outside of Delaware. Strong pay-for-performance alignment, clear disclosure, and credible governance messaging may become more consequential when a redomiciliation is viewed as enhancing board discretion and lessening shareholder remedies.</li>
</ul>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/10/02/corporate-redomiciliation-to-texas-continues-despite-proxy-advisor-scrutiny/#more-184057" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Corporate Redomiciliation to Texas Continues Despite Proxy Advisor Scrutiny">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/10/02/corporate-redomiciliation-to-texas-continues-despite-proxy-advisor-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
