<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/contributor/arthur-crozier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2021 13:14:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Activism In Context: Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/22/activism-in-context-where-weve-been-where-were-going/</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/22/activism-in-context-where-weve-been-where-were-going/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=136562?d=20210222090935EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Activism In Context: Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going Depressed Activism in H1 2020 Comes Rearing Back in Q4 COVID depressed activism campaigns in H1 of 2020 to the lowest level since 2014, as many activists recognized that proxy contests would distract issuers from focusing on the urgent task of adapting their businesses to a [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Arthur B. Crozier and Gabrielle Wolf, Innisfree M&A, Inc., on Monday, February 22, 2021 </em><div style="background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px"><strong>Editor's Note: </strong> <a href="https://www.innisfreema.com/expert/arthur-crozier/">Arthur B. Crozier</a> is Chairman and <a href="https://www.innisfreema.com/expert/gabrielle-e-wolf/">Gabrielle Wolf</a> is a Director at Innisfree M&amp;A, Inc. This post is based on their Innisfree memorandum. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2291577">The Long-Term Effects of Hedge Fund Activism</a> by Lucian Bebchuk, Alon Brav, and Wei Jiang (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/08/19/the-long-term-effects-of-hedge-fund-activism/">here</a>); <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2948869">Dancing with Activists</a> by Lucian Bebchuk, Alon Brav, Wei Jiang, and Thomas Keusch (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/05/30/dancing-with-activists/">here</a>); and <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2921901">Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite? A Flesh-and-Blood Perspective on Hedge Fund Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance System</a> by Leo E. Strine, Jr. (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/02/23/who-bleeds-when-the-wolves-bite/">here</a>).
</div></hgroup><h2>Activism In Context: Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going <a class="footnote" id="1b" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/22/activism-in-context-where-weve-been-where-were-going/#1">[1]</a></h2>
<h3>Depressed Activism in H1 2020 Comes Rearing Back in Q4</h3>
<p>COVID depressed activism campaigns in H1 of 2020 to the lowest level since 2014, as many activists recognized that proxy contests would distract issuers from focusing on the urgent task of adapting their businesses to a volatile market and changing world. Activists were also surely wary of appearing to take advantage of unanticipated market dislocation, due to concerns that such efforts would not be favorably viewed by institutional investors in particular, whose votes are crucial to winning proxy contests. That said, as the pandemic and resulting lockdown lasted longer than first anticipated and businesses successfully adapted, activists arose from hibernation and launched 30 new campaigns in Q4 2020. <a class="footnote" id="2b" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/22/activism-in-context-where-weve-been-where-were-going/#2">[2]</a> According to Lazard, the number of U.S.-based activist campaigns in Q4 2020 represented a 200% increase from Q3 2020 campaign numbers and 34% of all 2020 campaigns. Of particular interest, one-fifth of the dramatic Q4 uptick was focused on targets with a market capitalization of at least $25B, <a class="footnote" id="3b" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/22/activism-in-context-where-weve-been-where-were-going/#3">[3]</a> including Comcast, Disney, Public Storage, Intel and ExxonMobil.</p>
<p>Despite its slowdown in 2020, several developments, particularly in the last half of 2020, are likely to continue and to define the state of activism in 2021.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/22/activism-in-context-where-weve-been-where-were-going/#more-136562" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Activism In Context: Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/22/activism-in-context-where-weve-been-where-were-going/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recap of the 2015 Proxy Season</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/11/02/recap-of-the-2015-proxy-season/</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/11/02/recap-of-the-2015-proxy-season/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 14:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No-action letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 14a-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=71911?d=20151103112517EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simpson Thacher &#38; Bartlett LLP recently released a PowerPoint deck, titled “Recap of the 2015 Proxy Season: What Happened, Lessons Learned and Looking Ahead to 2016.”  The deck (available here) provides an overview of the 2015 proxy season, as well as in-depth analysis regarding key developments, proposals and trends from the proxy season. 2015 Proxy [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Avrohom J. Kess, Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Monday, November 2, 2015 </em><div style="background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px"><strong>Editor's Note: </strong> <a href="http://www.stblaw.com/our-team/search/avrohom-j-kess" target="_blank">Avrohom J. Kess</a> is partner and head of the Public Company Advisory Practice at Simpson Thacher &amp; Bartlett LLP. This post is based on a Simpson Thacher presentation by Mr. Kess, <a href="http://www.stblaw.com/our-team/news/yafit-cohn" target="_blank">Yafit Cohn</a>, Arthur B. Crozier and Lissa Perlman. The complete presentation is available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Recap-of-the-2015-Proxy-Season.pptx">here</a>.
</div></hgroup><p>Simpson Thacher &amp; Bartlett LLP recently released a PowerPoint deck, titled “Recap of the 2015 Proxy Season: What Happened, Lessons Learned and Looking Ahead to 2016.”  The deck (available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Recap-of-the-2015-Proxy-Season.pptx" target="_blank">here</a>) provides an overview of the 2015 proxy season, as well as in-depth analysis regarding key developments, proposals and trends from the proxy season.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/11/02/recap-of-the-2015-proxy-season/#more-71911" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Recap of the 2015 Proxy Season">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/11/02/recap-of-the-2015-proxy-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
