<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/contributor/doug-francis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 13:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>A SPAC-tacular Distraction Compelling Opportunities in “Other” Event-Driven Investments</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/03/24/a-spac-tacular-distraction-compelling-opportunities-in-other-event-driven-investments/</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/03/24/a-spac-tacular-distraction-compelling-opportunities-in-other-event-driven-investments/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[International Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPACs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=137151?d=20210324085513EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The combination of record-level SPAC issuance and a flood of non-SPAC M&#38;A has created a supply-demand imbalance in the event-driven asset class. With SPACs garnering most of the limelight, we believe investors are missing an excellent opportunity to deploy capital into “other” event-driven investments, most prominently merger arbitrage. A Wild Year It’s certainly been an [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Doug Francis and Sam Klar, GMO LLC, on Wednesday, March 24, 2021 </em><div style="background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px"><strong>Editor's Note: </strong> Doug Francis is Head of Event-Driven Strategies and Sam Klar is Portfolio Manager of Event-Driven Strategies at GMO LLC. This post is based on their GMO memorandum.
</div></hgroup><p>The combination of record-level SPAC issuance and a flood of non-SPAC M&amp;A has created a supply-demand imbalance in the event-driven asset class. With SPACs garnering most of the limelight, we believe investors are missing an excellent opportunity to deploy capital into “other” event-driven investments, most prominently merger arbitrage.</p>
<h2>A Wild Year</h2>
<p>It’s certainly been an interesting 12 months in the event-driven asset class. From soft catalyst event situations upended by the onset of COVID in Q1 2020, to the March 2020 “Arbageddon” widening in merger arbitrage spreads, to countless instances of hedge fund repositioning causing atypical volatility in typically boring share class arbitrage. It’s been a truly wild ride.<br />
The combination of Q1 2020 performance challenges for the asset class and slow-to-recover new merger volume last spring and summer led to the perception that there was “nothing to do” in event-driven. The record issuance of SPACs in 2020 and early 2021, accompanied by some high-profile bouts of outperformance in former SPACs like Nikola, amended that narrative slightly. Recent commentary has been willing to stipulate that there was nothing to do in event-driven, apart from SPACs.</p>
<h2>The Current Opportunity</h2>
<p>As experienced event-driven investors, we’ve often chafed at the notion that event-driven’s attractiveness waxes and wanes as much as commentators would suggest. Indeed, our team mantra is “there’s almost always something to do,” and our historical results have supported this claim’s veracity.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/03/24/a-spac-tacular-distraction-compelling-opportunities-in-other-event-driven-investments/#more-137151" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading A SPAC-tacular Distraction Compelling Opportunities in “Other” Event-Driven Investments">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/03/24/a-spac-tacular-distraction-compelling-opportunities-in-other-event-driven-investments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
