<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/contributor/jamie-allen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 13:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Awakening Governance: ACGA China Corporate Governance Report 2018</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/08/25/awakening-governance-acga-china-corporate-governance-report-2018/</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/08/25/awakening-governance-acga-china-corporate-governance-report-2018/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 14:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=109944?d=20180827163225EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With its securities market continuing to internationalise and grow in complexity, China appears at a turning point in its application of CG and ESG principles. The time is right to strengthen communication and understanding between domestic and foreign market participants. Introduction: Bridging the gap The story of modern corporate governance in China is closely connected [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Jamie Allen and Li Rui (Nana Li), Asian Corporate Governance Association, on Saturday, August 25, 2018 </em><div style="background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px"><strong>Editor's Note: </strong> Jamie Allen is Secretary General and Li Rui (Nana Li) is Senior Research Analyst at the Asian Corporate Governance Association (ACGA). This post is based on the introduction to their ACGA report.
</div></hgroup><blockquote><p><em>With its securities market continuing to internationalise and grow in complexity, China appears at a turning point in its application of CG and ESG principles. The time is right to strengthen communication and understanding between domestic and foreign market participants.</em></p></blockquote>
<h2>Introduction: Bridging the gap</h2>
<p>The story of modern corporate governance in China is closely connected to the rapid evolution of its capital markets following the opening to the outside world in 1978. The 1980s brought the first issuance of shares by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and a lively over-the-counter market. National stock markets were relaunched in Shanghai and Shenzhen in 1990 to 1991, while new guidance on the corporatisation and listing of SOEs was issued in 1992. The first overseas listing of a state enterprise came in October 1992 in New York, followed by the first SOE listing in Hong Kong in 1993. Corporate governance reform gained momentum in the late 1990s, but it was less a byproduct of the Asian Financial Crisis than a need to strengthen the governance of SOEs listing abroad. The early 2000s then brought a series of major reforms on independent directors, quarterly reporting and board governance aimed squarely at domestically listed firms.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/08/25/awakening-governance-acga-china-corporate-governance-report-2018/#more-109944" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Awakening Governance: ACGA China Corporate Governance Report 2018">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/08/25/awakening-governance-acga-china-corporate-governance-report-2018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
