<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/contributor/jon-ballis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Just How Preferred is Your Preferred?</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/05/22/just-how-preferred-is-your-preferred/</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/05/22/just-how-preferred-is-your-preferred/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 13:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Director liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dual-class stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairness review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Term value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder suits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=89682?d=20170522091328EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many financial investors structure their investments in private companies in the form of preferred stock. This instrument provides the investor with a preference as to dividends and liquidation proceeds over other equityholders, typically management or legacy stockholders, who hold common stock. A recent Delaware case, ODN Holding, highlights some potential fiduciary duty complications when enforcing [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Daniel Wolf & Jon A. Ballis, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, on Monday, May 22, 2017 </em><div style="background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px"><strong>Editor's Note: </strong> <a class="external" href="https://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm?contentID=220&amp;itemID=9713" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">Daniel E. Wolf</a> and <a href="http://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm?contentID=220&amp;itemID=8522">Jon A. Ballis</a> are partners at Kirkland &amp; Ellis LLP. This post is based on a Kirkland &amp; Ellis publication by Mr. Wolf and Mr. Ballis. This post is part of the <a href="http://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="http://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.
</div></hgroup><p>Many financial investors structure their investments in private companies in the form of preferred stock. This instrument provides the investor with a preference as to dividends and liquidation proceeds over other equityholders, typically management or legacy stockholders, who hold common stock. A recent Delaware case, <em>ODN Holding</em>, highlights some potential fiduciary duty complications when enforcing those preferences in the context of an investment that has gone sideways or negative (i.e., when the portfolio company has limited funds available to satisfy those preferences—whether the payment of preferential dividends, the redemption of the preferred or the distribution of substantially all sale proceeds to the preferred).</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/05/22/just-how-preferred-is-your-preferred/#more-89682" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Just How Preferred is Your Preferred?">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/05/22/just-how-preferred-is-your-preferred/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
