<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/contributor/rebecca-crosby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2021 13:14:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>SEC Proposes Universal Proxy Ballots</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/11/01/sec-proposes-universal-proxy-ballots/</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/11/01/sec-proposes-universal-proxy-ballots/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Majority voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal proxy ballots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=74615?d=20161101090347EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 26, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed long-expected changes to the proxy rules in order to mandate the use of universal proxy cards in contested elections at annual meetings. The proposal is designed to address the current inability of shareholders to vote for the combination of board nominees of their choice in an [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Tuesday, November 1, 2016 </em><div style="background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px"><strong>Editor's Note: </strong> This post is based on a publication from Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell LLP by <a href="https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/ron-cami/?utm_source=vuture&amp;utm_medium=v_email&amp;utm_campaign=vuture_emails" target="_blank" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&amp;q=https://alerts.davispolk.com/api/email/handler?sid%3D686f192c-a8e4-4e88-889e-b59bb71ace25%26redirect%3Dhttp%253a%252f%252fwww.davispolk.com%252fprofessionals%252fron-cami%252f&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1478039360394000&amp;usg=AFQjCNGl38sXDiK4fjRo-sSYVJtilDZACg">Ron Cami</a>, <a href="https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/joseph-hall/?utm_source=vuture&amp;utm_medium=v_email&amp;utm_campaign=vuture_emails" target="_blank" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&amp;q=https://alerts.davispolk.com/api/email/handler?sid%3D686f192c-a8e4-4e88-889e-b59bb71ace25%26redirect%3Dhttp%253a%252f%252fwww.davispolk.com%252fprofessionals%252fjoseph-hall%252f&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1478039360395000&amp;usg=AFQjCNFtfOLmA97Wzj6bhEr1Slo675lfHg">Joseph A. Hall</a>, <a href="https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/phillip-mills/?utm_source=vuture&amp;utm_medium=v_email&amp;utm_campaign=vuture_emails">Phillip R. Mills</a>, <a href="https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/ning-chiu/?utm_source=vuture&amp;utm_medium=v_email&amp;utm_campaign=vuture_emails">Ning Chiu</a>, and <a href="https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/rebecca-crosby/?utm_source=vuture&amp;utm_medium=v_email&amp;utm_campaign=vuture_emails">Rebecca E. Crosby</a>. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a class="external" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2805136" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Universal Proxies</a> by Scott Hirst (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/10/24/universal-proxies/">here</a>).
</div></hgroup><p>On October 26, the Securities and Exchange Commission <a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2016/34-79164.pdf">proposed long-expected changes</a> to the proxy rules in order to mandate the use of universal proxy cards in contested elections at annual meetings. The proposal is designed to address the current inability of shareholders to vote for the combination of board nominees of their choice in an election involving a proxy contest. Under the proposal, each party in a contested election—management and one or more dissident shareholders—would continue to distribute its own proxy materials and use its own proxy card to solicit votes for its preferred slate of nominees. However, each party’s proxy card would be required to include the nominees of all parties, and thus enable the proxy voter to select its preferred combination of candidates.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/11/01/sec-proposes-universal-proxy-ballots/#more-74615" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading SEC Proposes Universal Proxy Ballots">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/11/01/sec-proposes-universal-proxy-ballots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
