<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/08/05/say-on-pay-in-2011-lessons-and-coming-attractions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 14:13:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Say on Pay in 2011: Lessons and Coming Attractions</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/08/05/say-on-pay-in-2011-lessons-and-coming-attractions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=say-on-pay-in-2011-lessons-and-coming-attractions</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/08/05/say-on-pay-in-2011-lessons-and-coming-attractions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden parachutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on frequency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on pay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=19633?d=20150113161328EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the 2011 proxy season coming to a close, this report reviews the results of the inaugural season of shareholder advisory votes under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act through June 23, 2011. It further offers recommendations for companies to consider in making their compensation and governance decisions to help position them [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by James D.C. Barrall, Latham & Watkins LLP, and Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, on Friday, August 5, 2011 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.lw.com/attorneys.aspx?page=attorneybio&amp;attno=00447" target="_blank">James Barrall</a> is a partner at Latham &amp; Watkins LLP, and <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/publications/bio.cfm?id=358" target="_blank">Matteo Tonello</a> is Director of Corporate Governance for The Conference Board, Inc. This post is based on a Conference Board <em>Director Note</em> by Mr. Barrall and his colleague <a href="http://www.lw.com/Attorneys.aspx?page=AttorneyBio&amp;attno=04189" target="_blank">Alice M. Chung</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>With the 2011 proxy season coming to a close, this report reviews the results of the inaugural season of <a name="1b"></a>shareholder advisory votes under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act through June 23, 2011. It further offers recommendations for companies to consider in making their compensation and governance decisions to help position them for future say-on-pay (SOP) votes. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2011/08/05/say-on-pay-in-2011-lessons-and-coming-attractions#1">[1]</a></p>
<p>The 2011 proxy season—the first in which all but small public companies in the United States were required to allow shareholders to vote on an advisory basis to approve or disapprove the compensation of their named executive <a name="2b"></a>officers—is almost over. Companies with non-calendar fiscal years or delayed meetings will continue to hold SOP votes throughout 2011, but a majority of U.S. companies that are now subject to the vote requirements (and most S&amp;P 500 and Russell 3000 companies with calendar fiscal years) have already had their 2011 shareholder meetings. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2011/08/05/say-on-pay-in-2011-lessons-and-coming-attractions#2">[2]</a></p>
<p>There have been many twists and turns this proxy season, but some clear trends and bottom lines have emerged. Now, while experience and memories are fresh, is a good time to review the results of the inaugural SOP season, identify trends and issues, and assess the landscape for future regulations and other developments. Most importantly, companies need to take all of this into account as they make the compensation and governance decisions in 2011 that will best position them for the 2012 proxy season and SOP votes to come.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/08/05/say-on-pay-in-2011-lessons-and-coming-attractions/#more-19633" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Say on Pay in 2011: Lessons and Coming Attractions">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/08/05/say-on-pay-in-2011-lessons-and-coming-attractions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
