<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/10/18/making-sense-of-the-current-esg-landscape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Making Sense of the Current ESG Landscape</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/10/18/making-sense-of-the-current-esg-landscape/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=making-sense-of-the-current-esg-landscape</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/10/18/making-sense-of-the-current-esg-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Social Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedge funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder primacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=111637?d=20181018092430EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question whether a public for-profit company can “do good” and make money at the same time has never been more relevant. Public companies are being bombarded with messages, requests and demands around “ESG”—environmental, social and governance—matters. These come from shareholders, asset managers, special interest groups, activist investors, private equity funds, ESG rating firms, trade [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Peter Atkins, Marc Gerber and Richard Grossman, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, October 18, 2018 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/a/atkins-peter-a" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Peter Atkins</a>, <a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/g/gerber-marc-s" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Marc Gerber</a> and <a href="https://www.skadden.com/professionals/g/grossman-richard-j" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Richard Grossman</a> are partners at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom LLP. This post is based on a Skadden memorandum by Mr. Atkins, Mr. Gerber, and Mr. Grossman. <span class="paragraph">Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2464561">Socially Responsible Firms</a> by Alan Ferrell, Hao Liang, and Luc Renneboog (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2014/08/06/socially-responsible-firms/">here</a>) and <a class="external" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2773367" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Social Responsibility Resolutions</a><span class="highlight"><span class="colour"><span class="font"><span class="size"> by Scott Hirst (discussed on the Forum </span></span></span></span><a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/10/31/social-responsibility-resolutions/">here</a><span class="highlight"><span class="colour"><span class="font"><span class="size">).</span></span></span></span></span></p>
</div></hgroup><p>The question whether a public for-profit company can “do good” and make money at the same time has never been more relevant. Public companies are being bombarded with messages, requests and demands around “ESG”—environmental, social and governance—matters. These come from shareholders, asset managers, special interest groups, activist investors, private equity funds, ESG rating firms, trade groups, politicians, regulators, academics and others. They take a variety of forms, including shareholder proposals, surveys and questionnaires, letter writing campaigns, proxy voting policies, investor stewardship reports, speeches, white papers, academic studies, and legislation. Topics covered (putting aside the “G”—the governance issues with which boards are likely to be familiar) are numerous and varied, including sustainability, climate change, water management, human capital management, gender pay equity, board and workforce diversity, supply chain management, political and lobbying expenditures, the opioid crisis, and gun control. Boards of directors and management of public companies need to understand the increasing importance of this ESG landscape in which the company and investors are operating, including the growing prominence of ESG investing, the company’s environmental and social (E&amp;S) profile and vulnerabilities, and the path forward for the company as it deals with particular E&amp;S issues.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/10/18/making-sense-of-the-current-esg-landscape/#more-111637" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Making Sense of the Current ESG Landscape">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/10/18/making-sense-of-the-current-esg-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
