<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/29/the-realities-of-robo-voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 13:32:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Realities of Robo-Voting</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/29/the-realities-of-robo-voting/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-realities-of-robo-voting</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/29/the-realities-of-robo-voting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fund managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glass Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=112987?d=20181212105911EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research from the American Council for Capital Formation identifies a troubling number of assets mangers that are automatically voting in alignment with proxy advisor recommendations, in a practice known as “robo-voting.” This trend has helped facilitate a situation in which proxy firms are able to operate as quasi-regulators of America’s public companies, despite lacking [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Timothy M. Doyle, American Council for Capital Formation (ACCF), on Thursday, November 29, 2018 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Timothy M. Doyle is Vice President of Policy &amp; General Counsel at the American Council for Capital Formation (ACCF). This post is based on an ACCF memorandum by Mr. Doyle.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>New research from the American Council for Capital Formation identifies a troubling number of assets mangers that are automatically voting in alignment with proxy advisor recommendations, in a practice known as “robo-voting.” This trend has helped facilitate a situation in which proxy firms are able to operate as quasi-regulators of America’s public companies, despite lacking any statutory authority.</p>
<p>While some of the largest institutional investors expend significant resources to evaluate both management and shareholder proposals, many others fail to conduct proper oversight of their proxy voting decisions, instead outsourcing decisions to proxy advisors. We reviewed those asset managers that historically vote in line with the largest proxy firm, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), finding 175 entities, representing more than $5 trillion in assets under management, that follow the advisory firm over 95% of the time.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/29/the-realities-of-robo-voting/#more-112987" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Realities of Robo-Voting">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/29/the-realities-of-robo-voting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
