<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/07/13/board-diversity-action-expands-to-courtrooms-regulators-and-investors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 20:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Board Diversity Action Expands to Courtrooms, Regulators, and Investors</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/07/13/board-diversity-action-expands-to-courtrooms-regulators-and-investors/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=board-diversity-action-expands-to-courtrooms-regulators-and-investors</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/07/13/board-diversity-action-expands-to-courtrooms-regulators-and-investors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=147650?d=20220713092919EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the year since my colleague Fabrice Houdart wrote that LGBTQ+ inclusion in the boardroom is simply good governance, the board diversity landscape has heated up, become more complex, and provided glimpses into what the future may hold in this interesting area of corporate governance. Below are a few key themes that I expect will characterize [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Matthew Fust, on Wednesday, July 13, 2022 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Matthew Fust serves as a board member for several publicly traded and venture-backed biopharmaceutical companies and is a corporate finance and strategy advisor in the life sciences industry. This post is based on an <i>NACD BoardTalk </i>publication. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3556713">Politics and Gender in the Executive Suite</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> (discussed on the Forum </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/04/14/politics-and-gender-in-the-executive-suite/">here</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;">) by Alma Cohen, Moshe Hazan, and David Weiss; </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3812642">Will Nasdaq&#8217;s Diversity Rules Harm Investors?</a> <span style="font-size: 10pt;">(discussed on the Forum </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/04/08/will-nasdaqs-diversity-rules-harm-investors/">here</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;">) by Jesse M. Fried; and </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3788159">Duty and Diversity</a> <span style="font-size: 10pt;">(discussed on the Forum </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/03/04/duty-and-diversity/">here</a><span style="font-size: 10pt;">) by Chris Brummer and Leo E. Strine, Jr.</span></p>
</div></hgroup><p>In the year since my colleague Fabrice Houdart wrote that <a href="https://blog.nacdonline.org/posts/lgbtq-inclusion-boardroom" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LGBTQ+ inclusion in the boardroom is simply good governance</a>, the board diversity landscape has heated up, become more complex, and provided glimpses into what the future may hold in this interesting area of corporate governance. Below are a few key themes that I expect will characterize the board diversity landscape.</p>
<p><strong>When attention is focused board diversity can increase quickly, but the gains may be narrow.</strong> Much of the action on corporate board diversity over the past few years has been catalyzed by legislative action (notably in California, where two laws aimed at board diversity were <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/16/success/board-diversity-california-efforts-blocked/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">struck down this spring</a>, but not before leaving their mark) and the national reckoning on racial justice, both serving as wake-up calls for many corporations.</p>
<p>The impact of California’s landmark 2018 legislation requiring gender diversity on the boards of public companies headquartered in the state has been stunning. In 2018, nearly one-third of public company boards in California were composed of all men. <a href="https://www.calpartnersproject.org/mappinginclusion" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">According to the most recent report from the California Partners Project</a>, today fewer than 2 percent are. In addition, women hold 32 percent of public company board seats in California, double the number of seats held in 2018. In 2022, two-thirds of California public companies have three or more women directors—six times as many as in 2018. However, progress has been uneven. For example, although California’s population is nearly 20 percent Latino, <a href="https://www.latinocorporatedirectors.org/docs/LCDA_California_Boardroom_Equity_Report_May_2022.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a recent report by the Latino Corporate Directors Association</a> found that between the September 30, 2020 enactment of California’s AB 979 legislation, the second board diversity law, and the end of 2021, the share of California public company board seats held by Latinos grew by only one percentage point, to 3 percent of California’s public company board seats.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/07/13/board-diversity-action-expands-to-courtrooms-regulators-and-investors/#more-147650" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Board Diversity Action Expands to Courtrooms, Regulators, and Investors">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/07/13/board-diversity-action-expands-to-courtrooms-regulators-and-investors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
