<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/09/05/sec-comment-letter-review-signals-investor-support-for-preserving-executive-compensation-and-governance-disclosure-requirements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 11:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SEC Comment Letter Review Signals Investor Support for Preserving Executive Compensation and Governance Disclosure Requirements</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/09/05/sec-comment-letter-review-signals-investor-support-for-preserving-executive-compensation-and-governance-disclosure-requirements/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sec-comment-letter-review-signals-investor-support-for-preserving-executive-compensation-and-governance-disclosure-requirements</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/09/05/sec-comment-letter-review-signals-investor-support-for-preserving-executive-compensation-and-governance-disclosure-requirements/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 11:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Goverance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAFs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=183600?d=20260904150053EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KEY TAKEAWAYS 1. Large institutional investors have not directly weighed in  The largest asset managers have not directly commented on the proposal; an association of these investors indicated support for reform, while suggesting many disclosures remain. 2. Broad rollbacks face resistance The most consistent message was opposition to $2B NAF status, exemption of 80%+ of issuers, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Mike Kesner and Annie Chen, Pay Governance LLC, on Saturday, September 5, 2026 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Mike Kesner is a Partner and Annie Chen is a Consultant at Pay Governance LLC. This post is based on their Pay Governance memorandum.</p>
</div></hgroup><h2>KEY TAKEAWAYS</h2>
<table width="101%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="24%">1. Large institutional investors have not directly weighed in  The largest asset managers have not directly commented on the proposal; an association of these investors indicated support for reform, while suggesting many disclosures remain.</td>
<td width="24%">2. Broad rollbacks face resistance<br />
The most consistent message was opposition to $2B NAF status, exemption of 80%+ of issuers, and a blanket five-year IPO on ramp.</td>
<td width="24%">3. Investor respondents value transparency<br />
Investor respondents continue to use CD&amp;A, Say-on-Pay, perquisite disclosure, and auditor attestation for governance and voting decisions.</td>
<td width="26%">4. Reform should focus on usability<br />
Commenters supported better dashboards, standardization, XBRL tagging, improved visuals, clearer metrics, and comparability.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/09/05/sec-comment-letter-review-signals-investor-support-for-preserving-executive-compensation-and-governance-disclosure-requirements/#more-183600" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading SEC Comment Letter Review Signals Investor Support for Preserving Executive Compensation and Governance Disclosure Requirements">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/09/05/sec-comment-letter-review-signals-investor-support-for-preserving-executive-compensation-and-governance-disclosure-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
