<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/10/07/climate-in-the-boardroom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 11:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Climate in the Boardroom</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/10/07/climate-in-the-boardroom/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=climate-in-the-boardroom</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/10/07/climate-in-the-boardroom/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackRock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanguard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/?p=122639?d=20191008114024EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Key Climate-Related Shareholder Resolutions Would Have Passed with BlackRock and Vanguard Support The world’s largest asset managers BlackRock and Vanguard control the largest blocks of shares in nearly every publicly traded firm in the U.S. The pattern of ownership is seen in the energy and utility industries, and across the companies at which there were [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Eli Kasargod-Staub, Majority Action, on Monday, October 7, 2019 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">Eli Kasargod-Staub is Executive Director of Majority Action and the Climate Majority Project. This post is based on his Majority Action report. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2982617">The Agency Problems of Institutional Investors</a> by Lucian Bebchuk, Alma Cohen, and Scott Hirst (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/06/12/index-fund-stewardship/">here</a>); <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/28/index-funds-and-the-future-of-corporate-governance-theory-evidence-and-policy/">Index Funds and the Future of Corporate Governance: Theory, Evidence, and Policy</a> by Lucian Bebchuk and Scott Hirst (discussed on the forum <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3282794">here</a>); and <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2773367">Social Responsibility Resolutions</a> by Scott Hirst (discussed on the Forum <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2016/10/31/social-responsibility-resolutions/">here</a>).</p>
</div></hgroup><h2>Key Climate-Related Shareholder Resolutions Would Have Passed with BlackRock and Vanguard Support</h2>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-122891" src="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/fig13.png" alt="" width="1005" height="815" srcset="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/fig13.png 1005w, https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/fig13-300x243.png 300w, https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/fig13-768x623.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1005px) 100vw, 1005px" /></p>
<p>The world’s largest asset managers BlackRock and Vanguard control the largest blocks of shares in nearly every publicly traded firm in the U.S. The pattern of ownership is seen in the energy and utility industries, and across the companies at which there were critical climate votes in 2019 (see Figure 13). The two asset managers were both in the top five common stock shareholders at all 28 companies with critical climate resolutions.</p>
<p>BlackRock and Vanguard were the two largest shareholders at 18 of these 28 companies.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/10/07/climate-in-the-boardroom/#more-122639" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Climate in the Boardroom">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/10/07/climate-in-the-boardroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
