Monthly Archives: September 2024

Private company outlook: Governance

Wolfe Tone is Vice Chair and Bob Rosone and Maureen Bujno are Managing Directors at Deloitte LLP. This post is based on a Deloitte memorandum by Mr. Tone, Mr. Rosone, Ms. Bujno, Jamie McCall, and Robert Lamm.

Deloitte asked 100 C-level private business leaders about their outlook regarding business priorities, corporate governance, AI and business risks in the next 12 months.

OBJECTIVE

Deloitte Private’s pulse survey, “Private Company Outlook,” gauges private company leaders’ perspectives on opportunities and risks to business now and in the future.

AUDIENCE

The survey of 100 private company leaders was conducted online by an independent research company between June 13 and 18, 2024. Respondents represented C-level, president, board member, partner/owner roles at private companies in the US with annual revenues of US$100 million to US$1 billion+.porate governance, AI and business risks in the next 12 months. READ MORE »

Will A Bump-Up Exclusion Bar Coverage of an M&A Settlement?

Peter Adams is a Partner, Jacquelyn Burke is a Special Counsel, and Linh Nguyen is an Associate at Cooley LLP. This post is based on their Cooley memorandum.

Public company insurance policyholders beware: In recent years, insurance carriers have increasingly invoked the “bump-up” exclusion, which is a carve out provision typically found in directors and officers (D&O) insurance policies. In many public company M&A deals, the shareholders of the target or acquired company will file a lawsuit challenging the deal, generally alleging that the board violated its fiduciary duties or the law by selling the company for a below-market price. Enter the bump-up exclusion, which bars coverage for settlements (or judgments) in M&A litigation that, in effect, bump up the consideration paid to the shareholders of the target company in the underlying deal. In other words, if settlement of the M&A claim would result in the acquired company’s shareholders receiving more value for the sale of the company, then the settlement will not be covered by the D&O policy.

Industry observers have noted that, as public company M&A deal litigation has accelerated, D&O insurers are relying on the bump-up exclusion more frequently and applying it more broadly to exclude coverage. Historically, insurers used the bump-up exclusion to prevent buy-side insureds from colluding with a target company’s board to acquire the company for less than market value, then turning to their insurers to fill the gap after the target company shareholders inevitably sue for the shortfall. Now, insurers are drafting and enforcing bump-up exclusions to bar coverage even when it is the sell-side insured or acquisition target who is seeking coverage.

READ MORE »

SEC Files Brief in Support of Climate Disclosure Rules

David A. Bell, Ran Ben-Tzur, and Alan C. Smith are Partners at Fenwick & West LLP. This post is based on a Fenwick memorandum by Mr. Bell, Mr. Ben-Tzur, Mr. Smith, Dean KristyWendy Grasso, and Merritt Steele.

What You Need To Know

  • The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a legal brief in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in support of its controversial climate disclosure rules (Climate Rules).
  • The SEC argues it has express statutory authority from Congress to adopt the Climate Rules, that it acted reasonably in adopting the Climate Rules and satisfied the Administrative Procedures Act’s (APA) procedural requirements, and that the First Amendment does not prohibit the Climate Rules.
  • Various consumer advocacy, environmental, investor and academic groups, attorney generals, and former SEC officials have filed amicus briefs in the Eighth Circuit, defending the Climate Rules and the SEC’s authority to adopt them—contending that climate-related financial risks are real, disclosure is needed, and the rules are not unduly burdensome.
  • Petitioners’ reply brief is due by September 3.

READ MORE »

Page 7 of 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7