-
Supported By:


Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Shareholder Litigation and Changes in Disclosure Behavior
While the deterrent function of private litigation has been studied in some detail, we investigate the existence of another potential benefit of securities litigation: a change in the conduct of the firms involved in private litigation. Specifically, we examine changes in the disclosure behavior of firms involved in 827 disclosure-related class-action securities litigation cases filed […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, Securities Regulation
Tagged Disclosure, Earnings management, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on Shareholder Litigation and Changes in Disclosure Behavior
Advance Notice Bylaws: Lessons from Recent Cases
My colleague Laura A.McIntosh and I have written an article recently published in the New York Law Journal on May 22, 2008 entitled Corporate Governance Update: Advance Notice Bylaws: Lessons from Recent Cases. Until recently, advance notice bylaws have been unremarkable and fairly uncomplicated provisions, generally easily complied with and largely uncontroversial. In two recent […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Advanced notice, Charter & bylaws, JANA Fund v. CNET, Levitt v. Office Depot
Comments Off on Advance Notice Bylaws: Lessons from Recent Cases
Shareholder Activism: Proactive Defense and Informed Response
ICR, the financial communications consulting firm, recently released a discussion paper Shareholder Activism: Proactive Defense and Informed Response. The paper explores the current environment of shareholder activism driven by “Sharks,” “Wolves” and “Jaguars,” as well as these activists’ goals, motives and tactics. The paper also presents a well documented strategy for issuers outlining potential vulnerabilities […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Hedge funds, ICR, Shareholder activism
Comments Off on Shareholder Activism: Proactive Defense and Informed Response
Use of Illegal Business Practices Continues in Many Organizations
Ernst & Young recently released its 10th Global Fraud Survey “Corruption or Compliance – Weighing the Costs“. As the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) becomes the de facto anti-corruption standard worldwide, over 50% of US executives — and 84% globally — still know little to nothing of its key provisions, according to the survey. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Anti-corruption, Compliance & ethics, Corporate fraud, FCPA
Comments Off on Use of Illegal Business Practices Continues in Many Organizations
Recent Developments in Delaware Corporation Law
Over the past year, the areas of corporation law impacting how transaction attorneys guide their clients developed at a significant pace. This trend emerged with Vice Chancellor Strine’s Netsmart, Topps, and Lear opinions, issued during the height of the private equity-led LBO boom and continued through Chancellor Chandler’s United Rentals opinion, in which the Court […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Delaware cases, Delaware law, Leveraged acquisitions
Comments Off on Recent Developments in Delaware Corporation Law
ProxyDemocracy.org
It’s the height of proxy season, and with the high-profile shareholder meetings taking place at Exxon last week and Yahoo later this summer, a new website ProxyDemocracy.org offers tools to help individual investors take part in the process. Although individuals own over 25% of US equity, institutional investors run the show when it comes to […]
Click here to read the complete postMy Resolution at ExxonMobil
At EXXON’S Shareholders Meeting on Wednesday, Resolution #5 received 39.5% of the vote, marginally shy of last year’s 40%. I was relieved as we early learned that the company was seriously soliciting investors to vote against our resolution. The realities of the proxy process are that an issuer has vast advantage. There are many large […]
Click here to read the complete postDelaware’s Guidance Function
Editor’s Note: This post is from J.W. Verret of the George Mason University School of Law. This post is part of the Delaware law series, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available here. I recently co-authored an article with Chief Justice Myron T. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Op-Eds & Opinions
Tagged Delaware articles, Delaware law, General governance, Shareholder value
Comments Off on Delaware’s Guidance Function
Seventh Circuit Rules on Mutual Fund Advisory Fees in Jones v. Harris Associates
As noted in an article by Floyd Norris of the New York Times, a panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled in Jones v. Harris Associates that courts should play a limited role in reviewing fees charged by mutual fund advisors. In an opinion by Judge Frank Easterbrook, the court relied on […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Financial advisers, Jones v. Harris, Mutual funds, U.S. federal courts
Comments Off on Seventh Circuit Rules on Mutual Fund Advisory Fees in Jones v. Harris Associates
Explorations in Executive Compensation
Enhanced proxy pay disclosures, which the SEC believed would assist shareholders trying to assess the efficacy of executive compensation at their portfolio companies, have mainly underscored the elaborate and opaque nature of most pay programs. A new paper from RiskMetrics Group entitled Explorations in Executive Compensation aims to guide shareholders through the maze of terminology […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Executive Compensation, Governance standards, ISS, SEC
Comments Off on Explorations in Executive Compensation