The Top Five Delaware Cases of 2007

Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance & Financial Regulation, on
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
2 Comments print this page Print
, ,
More from:
Editor’s Note: This post is from Francis G.X. Pileggi of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC. This post is part of the Delaware law series, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available here.

Professor J. Robert Brown of the University of Denver College of Law (and a Guest Contributor on this Blog) recently provided a “Top Five” list of Delaware cases that–in his view–show why Delaware is “anti-shareholder and anti-plaintiff.” I realize that there are many experts who can rebut the professor’s arguments far more persuasively than I, and I am well aware that the Delaware bench certainly does not need my help to defend it.

Nonetheless, having just completed my review of key 2007 Delaware corporate decisions, I offer my own “counter-list” of the Top Five Cases of 2007 that show that the Delaware courts take shareholder rights and director duties very seriously. I could easily provide a longer list–but, for starters, here is an alternative list of the Top Five Delaware Cases of 2007.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

2 Trackbacks

  1. By Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 1/9/08 | Real Lawyers Have Blogs on Friday, November 8, 2013 at 3:28 pm

    […] The top 5 Delaware cases of 2007 – Fox Rothschild attorney Francis G.X. Pileggi, guest blogging at the Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog […]

  2. By Legal News - LexBlogosphere: 1/9/08 on Tuesday, November 12, 2013 at 4:29 pm

    […] The top 5 Delaware cases of 2007 – Fox Rothschild attorney Francis G.X. Pileggi, guest blogging at the Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog […]