This post from John G. Finley is based on a client memorandum by attorneys at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.
A bill introduced in the Senate on January 29, 2009 would generally require private funds to register with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and impose other regulatory requirements, including the filing of information for public disclosure such as the identity of investors and the value of fund assets. The “Hedge Fund Transparency Act” (the “Bill”) was introduced by senior senators Carl Levin (D-MI) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA). Despite the name of the Bill, it applies to all types of private funds and not just hedge funds.
ALL TYPES OF PRIVATE FUNDS REGULATED
Unlike recent unsuccessful regulatory efforts focused only on the hedge fund industry,[1] the Bill would apply to nearly all types of private funds. Aside from certain de minimis exclusions (e.g., funds with assets of less than $50,000,000), all hedge funds, private equity funds and other private funds would be subject to the new regulations through proposed amendments to the definition of an investment company in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”). Traditionally, private funds have relied on exemptions from the definition of an investment company under the Investment Company Act pursuant to §3(c)(1) (exempting any issuer whose securities are privately placed and owned by no more than 100 investors) and §3(c)(7) (exempting any issuer whose securities are privately placed and owned exclusively by “qualified purchasers”). The Bill proposes to amend the definition of “investment company” by deleting those two exemptions in their entirety, moving them to become the new §6(a)(6) (formerly §3(c)(1)) and §6(a)(7) (formerly §3(c)(7)). The text of the replacement sections would remain largely the same, with the notable differences that funds falling under these sections would now be considered “investment companies” and any “large investment companies” (funds with assets of $50,000,000 or more) would be required to meet certain registration and reporting conditions in order to be excluded from the onerous regulatory requirements otherwise imposed on investment companies required to register under the Investment Company Act (i.e., mutual funds).
PROPOSED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The Bill would impose the following registration and reporting requirements on any private fund relying on §6(a)(6) or §6(a)(7) with assets of $50,000,000 or more:
• Registration with the SEC
• Maintenance of such books and records as the SEC may require
• Cooperation with the SEC in regard to any request for information or examination
• The filing of an electronically-searchable “information form” at least once a year to be made publicly available by the SEC and to include information such as:
- the names and current addresses of each natural person who is a beneficial owner of the fund, any company with an ownership interest in the fund and the primary accountant and primary broker of the fund,
- an explanation of the structure of ownership interests in the fund,
- information on any affiliation that the fund has with another financial institution,
- a statement of any minimum investment requirement,
- the total number of investors, and
- the current value of the assets of the fund and any assets under management by the fund (apparently on an aggregate basis rather than on an investment-by-investment basis).
The Bill’s requirement of public disclosure of the names of private fund investors is likely to spark debate. The policy rationale for providing public disclosure of the names and addresses of investors in private funds is unclear and raises significant privacy concerns, especially for entities used in personal planning contexts.