Subprime Crisis and Board (In-)Competence

The following post comes to us from Harald Hau of the Finance Department at INSEAD and Marcel Thum, Professor of Business and Economics at TU Dresden.

In the paper, Subprime Crisis and Board (In-)Competence: Private vs. Public Banks in Germany, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we examine evidence for a systematic underperformance of Germany’s state-owned banks in the current financial crisis and study if the bank losses can be traced to the quality of bank governance.

For this purpose, we examine the biographical background of 593 supervisory board members in the 29 largest banks and find a pronounced difference in the finance and management experience of board representatives across private and state-owned banks. Measures of “boardroom competence” are then related directly to the magnitude of bank losses in the recent financial crisis. Our data confirms that supervisory board (in-)competence in finance is related to losses in the financial crisis.

Overall, our case study shows that state ownership comes at the costs of weaker monitoring of bank managers, possibly higher risk exposure and higher bank losses in a financial crisis. This finding is important given that state-ownership has even increased in the wake of the current crisis. The policy conclusions are straightforward. First, state ownership in the banking sector should be reduced as far as possible. Second, whenever state ownership is unavoidable, the financial competences of the supervisory boards have to be strengthened. Instead of installing politically connected board members, the state should delegate financial experts to the supervisory boards. Third, private institutions may similarly benefit from a more competent supervisory board. Enhanced shareholder rights and better shareholder representation can also pave the way for more bank board quality and more effective monitoring. Fourth, it seems worth exploring whether prudential bank regulations should explicitly encompass criteria for board competence and quality. These measures offer a promising path towards more financial stability because at the heart of any financial crisis are large bank losses.

The full paper is available for download here.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. Conseil en Organisation
    Posted Tuesday, September 7, 2010 at 9:34 am | Permalink

    Very interesting though controversial article. If If I don’t fully share your point of view concerning state ownership in the banking sector, I’m in total accordance with your opinion about increasing public or private competencies and setting up better shareholder representation within supervisory boards

2 Trackbacks

  1. By TOP BLOGS on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 at 12:07 pm

    Nominate Your Favorite Blogs for Top Business Blog Honors…

    Each year, LexisNexis honors a select group of blogs that set the online standard for a given industry…

  2. By Connecticut Employment Law Blog on Thursday, September 2, 2010 at 9:42 am

    Top 25 Business Law Blog? Only If You Say So…

    As I approach the three-year anniversary of this blog (stay tuned for more details), it’s certainly touching to receive accolades for this blog. Each year, LexisNexis “honors a select group of blogs that set the online standard for a given……