Ariel Babcock is Head of Research and Victoria Tellez is Senior Research Associate at FCLTGlobal. This post is based on their FCLTGlobal memorandum.
How Private Equity Can Drive Boardroom Diversity
Corporate boards are vital in helping companies maintain a longer-term focus while executing on shorter-term priorities. And a board’s unique stature, sitting atop the organization, allows it to shape corporate culture while guiding long-term strategy through a mix of encouragement, skepticism, and guidance. This role is consistent regardless of the ownership structure of the company—be it publicly held or privately controlled.
In 2018 FCLTGlobal embarked on in-depth research to identify the long-term habits of highly effective corporate boards. [1] We found four characteristics consistent across successful public companies:
- they spend more time on strategy;
- they ensure that directors have a stake in the long-term success of the company, often by encouraging board members to hold company stock through and beyond their tenure;
- they communicate directly with long-term shareholders; and
- they have a diverse board to bring differing perspectives and backgrounds for the benefit of the company.
Portfolio companies controlled by private equity firms have a unique structure. Their boards typically include representatives of the controlling private equity firm or firms; management of the company; outside/ independent directors (who may not be independent under the public company definition); and sometimes representatives of the limited partners, with either voting or observer status.
The boards of private equity-backed portfolio companies are already well versed in many of the key positive habits outlined above. We know from prior research and from conversations with our Members that portfolio company boards already spend more time on strategy than their public peers. And the directors of private equity-backed portfolio companies often have meaningful stakes in the success of the business, as they represent the primary shareholders of the firm and are naturally already “communicating directly” with those same shareholders.
That leaves one potentially missing element for private equity-owned companies: board-level diversity.
Research shows that diversity at the board level adds meaningful long-term value for companies and their owners. Data from Predicting Long-term Success for Corporations and Investors Worldwide shows that the most diverse boards added 3.3 percent to return on invested capital as compared to their least diverse peers. [2] Additional research confirms this trend—a 2015 study from McKinsey & Company found that companies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity are 35 percent more likely to have financial returns above their respective national industry medians, indicating that diversity can be a strong differentiator that shifts market share toward more diverse companies over time. [3]
In addition to improved performance, diverse boards consistently invest more in research and development and demonstrate an increased capacity for innovation, giving their companies a meaningful competitive advantage. [4] [5] A multifaceted team fosters not only creative innovation but resilience, and greater board diversity leads to lower volatility of returns. [6] Diverse perspectives and ideas keep companies flexible and better able to navigate, or rebound from, unexpected obstacles.
While these studies, and others, focused on the benefits of board diversity for public companies, there is no reason to believe that the same value-creation potential would not exist for those that are privately held—and data from The Carlyle Group confirms that view. In a study of its portfolio companies, Carlyle found that firms with two or more diverse board members recorded 12 percent higher annual earnings growth than companies with fewer diverse directors. [7]
Despite the evidence of the benefits of increased diversity, progress at private companies has been slow. A 2019 Crunchbase study of the boardrooms of the most heavily funded private companies revealed that just 7 percent of board seats were held by women, and 60 percent of companies did not have a single woman on their board. [8] There is little reason to believe that the numbers are any better for people of color or those representing other dimensions of diversity.
As private equity-backed companies comprise a significant and growing proportion of the economy, the diversity of their boards is receiving increased attention and provides an opportunity to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) alongside long-term value creation.
In order to make private boardrooms more inclusive, private investors must first assess their current practices and the role they can play in progress. Frank discussions between general partners (GPs) and limited partners (LPs), both in the diligence process and post-investment, can help both sides leverage their positions to enhance diversity and inclusion at the portfolio company level.
Once this initial evaluation has been made, the actual implementation of next steps is critical. Rather than resting on the laurels of loose commitments and vague targets around board diversity, grounding a plan in real-world, practical actions is a more direct way for GPs to play a role in real change, supported by their LPs.
Finally, and some would argue most importantly, accountability and reporting are required to ensure that private equity firms are hitting their portfolio-company diversity-related goals. A framework that tracks the status of current voting and non-voting portfolio company board directors and board chairs, as well as changes resulting from director turnover, can serve as a baseline for creating consistent information sharing between GPs and LPs.
Best Practices to Improve Portfolio Company Board Diversity
To improve in each of these areas, FCLTGlobal has convened numerous roundtables over the course of the past year. The output of these session are the practical guides that follow, which both GPs and LPs can use to evaluate, implement, and report on diversity and inclusion in the boardrooms of their privately held portfolio companies. For some firms, these may be the first steps. For others, they may be a refinement of plans already in motion. Regardless, they are a means to putting leaders in the boardroom of private companies who are representative, forward-looking, and positioned to create long-term value.
The best practices listed on the pages that follow are meant to serve as suggested behaviors to help general partners (GPs) and limited partners (LPs) increase diversity in their portfolio company boards. These suggestions were collected from leading GPs and LPs that have begun making strides in DEI in their own portfolios. We recognize that many GPs and LPs are at different stages of this process and expect these best practices can serve as a starting point for some and offer a few new ideas for others. Some ideas may be more, or less, relevant for certain jurisdictions, geographies, or segments of the market and are included here for consideration at the user’s discretion.
Guidance for GPs And LPs as Direct Private Equity Investors or Co-Investors | Actions for Operationalizing Guidance |
---|---|
Build senior support and oversight
Outspoken support from senior management helps remove barriers to change. |
|
Have clear approval processes
A clear approval process for board appointments can clarify who among the senior leadership of the GP firm is held accountable for portco board diversity improvement. |
|
Expand your network for sourcing board directors
Recruiting candidates beyond traditional talent pools can expand the company’s contacts and allow for diverse candidates to find directorship opportunities. |
|
Rethink traditional definitions of “board ready”
Removing “shortcuts,” such as prior positions or titles held, can increase the pool of qualified candidates. |
|
Make board seats attractive to diverse directors
Clearly articulating a detailed value proposition is critical for attracting diverse board candidates. |
|
Provide onboarding and development for all new board members
All new board members can benefit from a positive onboarding experience. |
|
Rethink the number and allocation of board seats
Being strategic about the use of board seats allows for more access to new and diverse ideas. |
|
LPs have a clear role to play in driving diversity on the boards of the portfolio companies in their chosen GPs’ funds, leading to better outcomes for both parties.
Guidance for LPs as Investors in a Fund | Actions for Operationalizing Guidance |
---|---|
Focus on investing with GPs that align with your diversity goals
Investing with forward-thinking GPs could lead to greater returns. |
|
Put diversity at the forefront
Incorporating evaluation of the diversity strategy into due diligence signals that it is a priority to the organization and not an afterthought. |
|
Offer support to GPs in sourcing and hiring diverse directors
Expanding the network for GPs to tap helps accelerate progress and demonstrates LP commitment to diversity. |
Give GPs access to your talent-recruiting networks. |
When nominating observers or nonvoting directors, consider diverse directors
Even when they are nonvoting, the presence of diverse people in the boardroom can amplify the voices of voting members of the board, magnifying their influence and contributing to a more inclusive boardroom environment. |
Use observers or nonvoting seats strategically to improve diversity in the room. |
The complete publication is available here.
Endnotes
1Ariel Babcock et al., Long-term Habits of Highly Effective Corporate Boards (Boston: FCLTGlobal, 2019), https://www.fcltglobal.org/resource/the-long-term-habits-of-a-highly-effective-corporate-board/.(go back)
2Bhakti Mirchandani et al., Predicting Long-term Success for Corporations and Investors Worldwide (Boston: FCLTGlobal, 2019), https://www.fcltglobal.org/resource/predicting-long-term-success-for-corporations-and-investors-worldwide/.(go back)
3Vivian Hunt et al., Why diversity matters (McKinsey & Company, 2015), https://www.mckinsey. com/business-functions/ organization/our-insights/why-diversity-matters#.(go back)
4Gennaro Bernile et al., Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies (2018), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/ S0304405X17303215.(go back)
5Embrace the Business Imperative of Diversity (BCG, 2020), https://www.bcg.com/en-us/featured-insights/winning-the-20s/embrace-business-imperative-of-diversity.(go back)
6Gennaro Bernile et al., Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies (2018), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X17303215.(go back)
7Better Businesses Have Diverse Teams (Carlyle, 2020), https://www.carlyle.com/impact/diverse-teams.(go back)
8Gené Teare, 2019 Study of Gender Diversity In Private Company Boardrooms (Crunchbase, 2019), https://news.crunchbase.com/news/2019-study-of-gender-diversity-in-private-company-boardrooms/.(go back)