Gail Weinstein is a Senior Counsel, Philip Richter is a Partner, and Steven Epstein is a Managing Partner at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP. This post is based on a Fried Frank memorandum by Ms. Weinstein, Mr. Richter, Mr. Epstein, Steve Steinman, Roy Tannenbaum, and Peter Simmons, and is part of the Delaware law series; links to other posts in the series are available here.
In Hyde Park v. FairXchange (July 30, 2024), the petitioner sought appraisal by the Court of Chancery of its shares of FairXchange, LLC (“FairX”), a nascent securities exchange that was acquired by Coinbase Global, Inc. Although neither party argued for reliance on the deal price to determine appraised fair value, and the court viewed the sale process as seriously flawed, the court held that reliance on the deal price was the “least bad” methodology to determine appraised fair value of an early-stage company with a plan to disrupt the market and no track record. Vice Chancellor Laster determined fair value to be equal to the deal price—$330 million (equating to $10.42 per share). The petitioner had proposed a valuation of $573 million, based on a DCF analysis; and the respondent had proposed a valuation of not more than $150 million, based on certain market-based factors.
