Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Court Broadens Insider Trading Claims Under Delaware Law

Shareholders may state a derivative claim for insider trading without alleging injury to the company–so held the Delaware Supreme Court in an opinion it recently issued in Kahn v. Kolberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P., No. 436, 2010 (June 20, 2011) (“In re Primedia“). Following the In re Primedia decision, plaintiffs can be expected to […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Court Broadens Insider Trading Claims Under Delaware Law

General Release — Handle with Caution

A recent decision by the highest court in New York highlights once again the broad finality of a general release given in a transactional context, even in cases where significant fraud is subsequently alleged. As we noted in a prior M&A Update, courts are reluctant to permit parties to circumvent the typically broad language of […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , | Comments Off on General Release — Handle with Caution

One-Year Anniversary Dodd-Frank Rulemaking Progress Report

This posting, the Davis Polk Dodd-Frank Rulemaking Progress Report, is the fifth in a series of Davis Polk presentations that illustrate graphically the progress of the rulemaking work that has been done and is yet to occur under the Dodd-Frank Act. The Progress Report has been prepared using data from the Davis Polk Regulatory Tracker™, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Financial Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , | Comments Off on One-Year Anniversary Dodd-Frank Rulemaking Progress Report

The Deterrence Effects of SEC Enforcement and Class Action Litigation

In the paper, The Deterrence Effects of SEC Enforcement and Class Action Litigation, we study whether SEC enforcement actions are associated with significant change in behavior of peer firms towards greater compliance. As complete compliance is not feasible, a rational enforcement policy implies enforcement efforts that maximize deterrence. Maximum deterrence is also explicitly mandated in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Inside the Boardroom: Responding to a Negative Say on Pay Vote

When stockholders deliver a negative vote on say on pay, directors face the question whether to change corporate policy in response – even if their best business judgment tells them that existing compensation programs are well-designed and are working well. In fact, a negative vote on say on pay does not change the board’s fiduciary […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Change of Control Special Committee: Breathing Life into CNX

Notwithstanding the excellence of the Delaware judiciary, the multiple standards of review under Delaware law for reviewing the actions of a target’s directors involved in a merger or acquisition transaction are cumbersome, a source of needless litigation, and economically inefficient. In my paper Change of Control Special Committee: Breathing Life into CNX, recently made public […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

D.C. Circuit Strikes Down Proxy Access Rules

In an opinion issued today in the challenge brought by the Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce to the SEC’s adoption of proxy access,  the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated the entire proxy access regime as an “arbitrary and capricious” exercise of the SEC’s authority.  The opinion, written by Judge […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Advisory Directors

In our paper, Advisory Directors, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we study the characteristics and effects of directors dedicated to providing strategic counsel to the chief executive officer (CEO). The question of how to structure corporate boards for effective oversight of top management has attracted significant academic and regulatory efforts in recent […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Dodd-Frank Act, One Year On

Editor’s Note: The following post on the Dodd-Frank Act, published on the one-year anniversary of its passage, comes to us from Michael S. Barr, Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School and former Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions at the Department of the Treasury. This post is based on a speech delivered […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Financial Crisis, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Richard Breeden and Larry Hamdan Join PCG’s Advisory Board

The Forum is pleased to announce that Richard Breeden and Larry Hamdan joined the Advisory Board of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance. They are joining the existing members of the Board: William Ackman, Peter Atkins, Joseph Bachelder, Richard Climan, Isaac Corré, John Finley, Byron S. Georgiou, Robert Mendelsohn, David Millstone, Theodore Mirvis, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Program News & Events | Tagged | Comments Off on Richard Breeden and Larry Hamdan Join PCG’s Advisory Board