Yearly Archives: 2023

Get boardroom ready: five ways to improve executive interactions with the board

Maria Castañón Moats is Leader, Paul DeNicola is a Principal, and Catie Hall is a Director at the Governance Insights Center at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. This post is based on their PwC memorandum.

Why? Whether you are an executive who has been meeting with the board regularly for years or you are in a new role that’s landing you on the agenda, these brief interactions play a huge role in the board’s view of your professional credibility. Your pre-read materials, presentation style, and overall executive presence will impact how the board views not only you but also your entire business function. Board meetings are your opportunity to highlight issues core to the business and to demonstrate your group’s value. So you need to prepare, and you need to make an impact.

Engaging with the board is not the same as engaging with other members of senior management. Directors’ expectations are different. Board members, company priorities, and presentation preferences change over time. Here, we share the differentiators that will turn executives from good to great in the boardroom.

READ MORE »

Compensation Season 2023

Adam J. Shapiro, Michael J. Schobel, and Erica E. Bonnett are Partners at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. This post is based on their Wachtell memorandum.

Economic volatility dominated the corporate landscape in 2022, with inflation and stock price declines making headlines throughout the year, while the labor market remained surprisingly resilient, reinforcing the scarcity and value of key talent. We identify below some of the fundamental themes that may shape company compensation decisions in 2023.

Last of the Dodd-Frank Act RegulationsMore than a decade after the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the SEC in 2022 adopted final regulations regarding pay versus performance disclosure and compensation clawbacks, marking the last of the compensation-related regulations borne of the 2008 financial crisis.

Pay versus Performance (PvP). The final rules require annual proxy disclosure of the relationship between executive compensation paid by a registrant and the registrant’s financial performance. Specifically, registrants must provide a table disclosing itemized compensation amounts and financial performance measures for their five most recently completed fiscal years (with the five-year look back phased in during a transition period). Registrants must comply with the new disclosure requirements in proxy and information statements for fiscal years ending on or after December 16, 2022; i.e., for the upcoming 2023 proxy season. For a detailed discussion of the final PvP rules, see our August 29, 2022 memorandum, “SEC Adopts Pay Versus Performance (PvP) Disclosure Rules.”

READ MORE »

Weekly Roundup: January 14-19, 2023


More from:

This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 14-19, 2023

Federal Reserve Proposes Climate Risk Guidance for Large Financial Institutions


The Angel’s in the Details: The Importance of Well-Drafted Board Minutes


ESG Momentum Remains Strong but May Face Headwinds in 2023


SEC Finalizes 10b5-1 Trading Plan Rule


SEC Continues Enforcement Scrutiny of ESG Claims by Investment Advisers


PwC’s Global Investor Survey 2022


Investment Stewardship Proxy voting U.S. guidelines 2023



Climate Risk Factors Soar at Largest Public Companies


Climate Risk Factors Soar at Largest Public Companies

Dean Kingsley is a Principal and Matt Solomon is a Senior Manager at Deloitte & Touche LLP. Kristen Jaconi is an Associate Professor of the Practice in Accounting and Executive Director at Peter Arkley Institute for Risk Management at the USC Marshall School of Business. This post is based on their recent Deloitte report. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance (discussed on the Forum here) and For Whom Corporate Leaders Bargain (discussed on the Forum here) both by Lucian A. Bebchuk and Roberto TallaritaRestoration: The Role Stakeholder Governance Must Play in Recreating a Fair and Sustainable American Economy—A Reply to Professor Rock (discussed on the Forum here) by Leo E. Strine, Jr.; and Stakeholder Capitalism in the Time of COVID (discussed on the Forum here) by Lucian Bebchuk, Kobi Kastiel, and Roberto Tallarita.

The past 12 months have continued to demonstrate the difficulty of effectively identifying and managing risk in the global business environment. Following the worst global pandemic in 100 years, U.S. companies have had to respond to the most significant armed conflict in Europe in over 80 years, the threat of use of nuclear weapons, a global trade and supply chain environment of unparalleled complexity, geopolitical tensions, the highest levels of inflation in 40 years, considerable global macro-economic uncertainty and volatility, and major tax, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and cyber regulatory reforms.

In this highly dynamic environment, companies have had to continue to both manage and report publicly on their key risks in compliance with rules the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) finalized in 2020 to address the increasingly lengthy and generic risk factor disclosures of registrants. For a description of these rules, see Appendix: Summary of SEC’s Final Rule on Regulation S-K, Item 105. In order to understand the impact of these amended risk factor disclosure requirements, Deloitte and the Peter Arkley Institute for Risk Management at the USC Marshall School of Business are conducting a series of analyses on the risk factor disclosures filed by the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 companies.

READ MORE »

Trends in Forum Selection Provisions, Merger Objection Class Actions and SPACs Continue To Shape Securities Litigation

Virginia Milstead is a Partner, and William J. O’Brien III is Counsel at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. This post is based on their Skadden memorandum.

Key Points

  • State courts are enforcing federal forum provisions for cases under the Securities Act, encouraging companies to amend their charters or bylaws to add these clauses.
  • The previous boom in SPAC IPOs and subsequent mergers is likely to sustain a flow of class actions involving those transactions.
  • Suits challenging mergers have not declined, but most are now brought as individual suits rather than class actions.

In the first nine months of 2022, plaintiffs filed 157 securities class action lawsuits, according to Cornerstone Research — a figure only slightly lower than the 162 filings in the same period in 2021. Looking behind the numbers, class actions relating to SPACs and cryptocurrencies are expected to remain elevated in 2023 (see “Rise in Crypto Securities Filings Could Persist”), while state courts rulings on federal forum provisions and a shift in tactic for plaintiffs challenging mergers will continue to play out and shape securities litigation in the coming year.

READ MORE »

Investment Stewardship Proxy voting U.S. guidelines 2023

Sandy Boss is Global Head of Investment Stewardship, John Roe is Head of Investment Stewardship (BIS) in the Americas, and Jessica McDougall is a Director at BlackRock Inc. This post is based on their BlackRock memorandum.

These guidelines should be read in conjunction with the BlackRock Investment Stewardship Global Principles.

Introduction

As stewards of our clients’ investments, BlackRock believes it has a responsibility to engage with management teams and/or board members on material business issues and, for those clients who have given us authority, to vote proxies in the best long-term economic interests of their assets.

The following issue-specific proxy voting guidelines (the “Guidelines”) summarize BlackRock Investment Stewardship’s (“BIS”) philosophy and approach to engagement and voting, as well as our view of governance best practices and the roles and responsibilities of boards and directors for publicly listed U.S. companies. These Guidelines are not intended to limit the analysis of individual issues at specific companies or provide a guide to how BIS will engage and/or vote in every instance. They are to be applied with discretion, taking into consideration the range of issues and facts specific to the company, as well as individual ballot items at shareholder meetings.

READ MORE »

PwC’s Global Investor Survey 2022

James Chalmers is Global Assurance Leader, Nadja Picard is Global Reporting Leader, and Hilary Eastman is Head of Global Investor at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. This post is based on their PwC memorandum. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes How Much Do Investors Care about Social Responsibility? (discussed on the Forum here) by Scott Hirst, Kobi Kastiel, and Tamar Kricheli-Katz; The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance (discussed on the Forum here) and Does Enlightened Shareholder Value Add Value? (discussed on the Forum here) both by Lucian A. Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita; and Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value (discussed on the Forum here) by Oliver Hart and Luigi Zingales.

The role of high-quality information in building trust

Investors use a wide array of sources to get information about how companies manage risks and opportunities, with financial reporting topping the list.

Investors’ concerns about greenwashing erode trust in what companies say about how they are addressing the sustainability risks and opportunities facing their business. These concerns also make it difficult for the investment profession to allocate capital to where it needs to go.

READ MORE »

SEC Continues Enforcement Scrutiny of ESG Claims by Investment Advisers

Mary Beth Houlihan, Diane Blizzard, and Scott A. Moehrke are Partners at Kirkland & Ellis LLP. This post is based on a Kirkland & Ellis memorandum by Ms. Houlihan, Ms. Blizzard, Mr. Moehrke, Norm Champ, Dan Kahl, and Alexandara Farmer. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes How Much Do Investors Care about Social Responsibility? (discussed on the Forum here) by Scott Hirst, Kobi Kastiel, and Tamar Kricheli-Katz; The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance (discussed on the Forum here) and Does Enlightened Shareholder Value Add Value? (discussed on the Forum here) both by Lucian A. Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita; Reconciling Fiduciary Duty and Social Conscience: The Law and Economics of ESG Investing by a Trustee (discussed on the Forum here) by Robert H. Sitkoff and Max M. Schanzenbach.

In November 2022, the SEC announced a settlement with Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. (GSAM), including a penalty in the amount of $4 million, in which the SEC alleged that GSAM initially failed to adopt procedures to ensure compliance with certain ESG claims made to GSAM clients/investors and then, once adopted, failed to follow such procedures. Like the BNY Mellon ESG order, which was settled last May for $1.5 million, the SEC focus was on statements made by the adviser regarding how it integrated ESG into its investment decision-making process. Notwithstanding the larger penalty in this GSAM order, the order only alleged an Advisers Act compliance rule violation while the BNY Mellon order included a compliance rule violation as well as additional allegations involving fraud/misstatements under the Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act. This order, the BNY order and the SEC proposed Advisers Act ESG rulemaking demonstrate the SEC’s focus on ESG claims by registered investments advisers.

READ MORE »

SEC Finalizes 10b5-1 Trading Plan Rule

Mike S. Kesner is a Partner at Pay Governance LLC. This post is based on his Pay Governance memorandum. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Insider Trading via the Corporation (discussed on the Forum here) by Jesse M. Fried.

Summary of Key Provisions

On December 14, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released the final Rule 10b5-1 requirements for preplanned trading plans for officers, other insiders, directors, and companies to qualify for the “affirmative defense” rule for such plans (i.e., the stock transaction was not entered into based on material nonpublic information).

The table below summarizes the impact on 10b5-1 plans and the related disclosure requirements.

SEC Rule 10b5-1 Implications and Considerations

Executives and directors who wish to avail themselves of the affirmative defense afforded trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 may need to consider whether to adopt such a plan prior to the effective date of the revised rule (60 days after the final rule is published in the Federal Register) as it would be subject to fewer restrictions and the new disclosure requirements.

Companies and their advisers may also want to revisit their policies regarding the use of 10b5-1 compliant trading plans to buy and sell company stock. Several companies encourage, but do not require, the use of 10b5-1 plans while other companies require they be used or do not have a formal policy. Given the additional restrictions to qualify, some companies may be reluctant to require the use of such plans.

It is also advisable that companies establish rigorous internal controls for collecting and reporting the adoption, modification, and cancellation of both qualified 10b5-1 and non-qualified pre-established trading plans, as both types of arrangements are subject to quarterly reporting requirements.

Finally, compensation committees will need to discuss and approve a policy regarding the granting of stock options (and other forms of equity compensation) when they are in possession of MNPI, as the policy must be disclosed in the company’s proxy.

Stock Option Grant Table

As noted above, the following table is triggered by stock options, SARs, or similar instruments granted four days before or one day after the release of MNPI.

 

ESG Momentum Remains Strong but May Face Headwinds in 2023

Marc S. Gerber and Greg Norman are Partners and Kathryn Gamble is an Associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. This post is based on a Skadden memorandum by Mr. Gerber, Mr. Norman, Ms. Gamble, Anita B. Bandy, Raquel Fox, and Simon Toms. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance (discussed on the Forum here) and For Whom Corporate Leaders Bargain (discussed on the Forum here) both by Lucian A. Bebchuk and Roberto TallaritaRestoration: The Role Stakeholder Governance Must Play in Recreating a Fair and Sustainable American Economy—A Reply to Professor Rock (discussed on the Forum here) by Leo E. Strine, Jr.; and Stakeholder Capitalism in the Time of COVID (discussed on the Forum here) by Lucian Bebchuk, Kobi Kastiel, and Roberto Tallarita.

Key Points

  • ESG is expected to remain a priority in 2023, with investors, employees and other stakeholders continuing to press for climate change and diversity policies and disclosures.
  • Companies in the U.S., U.K. and EU will face new government ESG mandates and proposals in the new year.
  • Businesses should closely monitor developments in legal challenges to companies’ diversity, equity and inclusion programs. U.S. Supreme Court rulings on affirmative action cases also have the potential to impact corporate diversity efforts.

As companies grapple with the business challenges that rising interest rates and an uncertain economic outlook present, there are the inevitable questions about whether companies should worry less about environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters. While stakeholders and regulators in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere seemed to be moving in the same direction regarding ESG concerns in 2021 and 2022, it is possible that 2023 will see divergences. This is particularly the case in the U.S., where ESG has become highly politicized and is likely to remain so for at least the next two years, given a divided Congress.

Nevertheless, companies will still have plenty to grapple with in 2023: the plethora of regulations and other initiatives already in place or in the works, and investors, employees, customers, communities and other stakeholders continuing to push companies along in their “ESG journey.”

READ MORE »

Page 62 of 65
1 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65