Yearly Archives: 2024

Proxy Season Global Briefing: Executive Pay

Maria Vu is a Senior Director, Bernadette O’Donoghue is a Director of Research & Product, and Silvia Gatti is a Director of Research at Glass, Lewis & Co. This post is based on a Glass Lewis memorandum by Ms. Vu, Ms. O’Donoghue, Ms.Gatti, Lisa Marie O’Malley, and Dimitri Zagoroff.

Whether you call it compensation or remuneration, how — and how much — executives get paid is a lightning rod for companies and investors around the world. The 2024 proxy season even saw questions raised about the impact of local pay norms on broader market competitiveness. While shareholder voting patterns varied by region, there were some universal trends, including the growing ubiquity of non-financial metrics — and a continuing uptick in total pay levels.

READ MORE »

Private company outlook: Governance

Wolfe Tone is Vice Chair and Bob Rosone and Maureen Bujno are Managing Directors at Deloitte LLP. This post is based on a Deloitte memorandum by Mr. Tone, Mr. Rosone, Ms. Bujno, Jamie McCall, and Robert Lamm.

Deloitte asked 100 C-level private business leaders about their outlook regarding business priorities, corporate governance, AI and business risks in the next 12 months.

OBJECTIVE

Deloitte Private’s pulse survey, “Private Company Outlook,” gauges private company leaders’ perspectives on opportunities and risks to business now and in the future.

AUDIENCE

The survey of 100 private company leaders was conducted online by an independent research company between June 13 and 18, 2024. Respondents represented C-level, president, board member, partner/owner roles at private companies in the US with annual revenues of US$100 million to US$1 billion+.porate governance, AI and business risks in the next 12 months. READ MORE »

Will A Bump-Up Exclusion Bar Coverage of an M&A Settlement?

Peter Adams is a Partner, Jacquelyn Burke is a Special Counsel, and Linh Nguyen is an Associate at Cooley LLP. This post is based on their Cooley memorandum.

Public company insurance policyholders beware: In recent years, insurance carriers have increasingly invoked the “bump-up” exclusion, which is a carve out provision typically found in directors and officers (D&O) insurance policies. In many public company M&A deals, the shareholders of the target or acquired company will file a lawsuit challenging the deal, generally alleging that the board violated its fiduciary duties or the law by selling the company for a below-market price. Enter the bump-up exclusion, which bars coverage for settlements (or judgments) in M&A litigation that, in effect, bump up the consideration paid to the shareholders of the target company in the underlying deal. In other words, if settlement of the M&A claim would result in the acquired company’s shareholders receiving more value for the sale of the company, then the settlement will not be covered by the D&O policy.

Industry observers have noted that, as public company M&A deal litigation has accelerated, D&O insurers are relying on the bump-up exclusion more frequently and applying it more broadly to exclude coverage. Historically, insurers used the bump-up exclusion to prevent buy-side insureds from colluding with a target company’s board to acquire the company for less than market value, then turning to their insurers to fill the gap after the target company shareholders inevitably sue for the shortfall. Now, insurers are drafting and enforcing bump-up exclusions to bar coverage even when it is the sell-side insured or acquisition target who is seeking coverage.

READ MORE »

SEC Files Brief in Support of Climate Disclosure Rules

David A. Bell, Ran Ben-Tzur, and Alan C. Smith are Partners at Fenwick & West LLP. This post is based on a Fenwick memorandum by Mr. Bell, Mr. Ben-Tzur, Mr. Smith, Dean KristyWendy Grasso, and Merritt Steele.

What You Need To Know

  • The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a legal brief in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in support of its controversial climate disclosure rules (Climate Rules).
  • The SEC argues it has express statutory authority from Congress to adopt the Climate Rules, that it acted reasonably in adopting the Climate Rules and satisfied the Administrative Procedures Act’s (APA) procedural requirements, and that the First Amendment does not prohibit the Climate Rules.
  • Various consumer advocacy, environmental, investor and academic groups, attorney generals, and former SEC officials have filed amicus briefs in the Eighth Circuit, defending the Climate Rules and the SEC’s authority to adopt them—contending that climate-related financial risks are real, disclosure is needed, and the rules are not unduly burdensome.
  • Petitioners’ reply brief is due by September 3.

READ MORE »

The tech-forward boardroom: Fostering richer boardroom conversations on technology

Lou DiLorenzo Jr. is a Principal, Lara Abrash is the Chair, and Anjali Shaikh is a Managing Director at Deloitte LLP. This post is based on a Deloitte memorandum by Mr. DiLorenzo Jr., Ms. Abrash, Ms. Shaikh, Cary Oven, Caroline Schoenecker, and Erika Maguire.

As technology continues to be an important driver in business transformation across organizations, there’s been a steady increase in boards looking to appoint board members with technology experience over the past few years. According to Deloitte’s 2023 Global Technology Leadership Study, 67% of organizations surveyed say at least one of their board members has experience in a technology leadership role,[1] compared to 56% in 2020.[2]

Despite technology and telecommunications being the most common industry background for new directors,[3] there is often still a gap in how well the board and technology leaders (chief information officers, chief technology officers, chief information security officers, etc.) are connecting on technology topics. Only 36% of board members surveyed report having full confidence in their technology leaders, and more than four in 10 C-suite executives say their board’s oversight of technology matters is not sufficient in either scope or depth.[4] Part of this disconnect could stem from boards governing multiyear transformations and capital spend, but still feeling like technology spend and costs are a black box since technology leaders struggle with measuring and articulating the business impact of technology investments.[5]

READ MORE »

Misalignment Under the Radar: Stealth Dual-Class Stock

James Crowe is the Research Manager at the Council of Institutional Investors. This post is based on a research article by the Council of Institutional Investors Research and Education Fund.

Executive Summary

Traditional dual-class or multi-class stock structures have received significant attention from market participants because of the disconnect they create between voting rights and economic ownership, thereby insulating company insiders from accountability to the company’s owners. However, it is important for investors to understand that companies can deliver substantially similar entrenchment mechanisms without creating multiple classes of common stock or adopting widely understood anti-takeover devices such as poison pills. In fact, there may be an incentive for insiders to achieve the same control enhancing outcomes without adopting a traditional dual-class structure. By doing so, they may receive the private benefits of outsized decision-making power without receiving the negative attention and stock price discount accompanying dual-class stock. This paper reviews nine examples of arrangements that could constitute “stealth dual class”: identity-based voting power, side agreements with favored shareholders, stock pyramiding/cross-ownership, umbrella partnerships and C corporations (UpCs), employees granting irrevocable proxy voting rights transferred from employees to insiders, golden shares, situational super-class issuances, non-equity votes and vote caps.

READ MORE »

Weekly Roundup: August 23-29, 2024


More from:

This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of August 23-29, 2024

Federal Court Issues Nationwide Injunction Blocking FTC Non-Compete Ban


Integrating Geopolitics and Sustainability for Future-Ready Leadership


Do I need to make money to go public?


The Sustainability J-Curve


Recent Developments for Directors


The Sound of Silence in Corporate Director Resignations


ISS Opens Survey for 2025 Policy Changes; Glass Lewis Seeks Informal Feedback


District Court Holds Missouri’s “Anti-ESG” Rules are Preempted by Federal Law, Violate First Amendment, and are Unconstitutionally Vague


Time to rethink performance shares?


The Golden Revolving Door


Proxy Season Global Briefing: Shareholder Rights & Corporate Governance


Proxy Season Global Briefing: Shareholder Rights & Corporate Governance

Chris Rushton and Brianna Castro are Senior Directors of Research and Aaron Wendt is a Director of Research at Glass, Lewis & Co. This post is based on a Glass Lewis memorandum by Mr. Rushton, Ms. Castro, Mr. Wendt, Bernadette O’Donoghue, Dimitri Zagoroff, and Eric Shostal.

The 2024 proxy season saw shareholder rights and corporate governance standards put to the test. Prioritizing market competitiveness, exchanges and regulators in several countries proposed or implemented reforms that threaten longstanding investor protections; the U.S. saw an increase in accounting and anti-takeover concerns, as issuers that listed during the 2020-2022 SPAC/IPO boom continue to adjust to the public markets; and companies around the world continued to integrate new technologies – and investor expectations – into their annual meeting format.

In the first installment of our Proxy Season Global Briefing, we provide a rundown of headlines and key trends relating to shareholder rights and corporate governance from around the globe. You can also access the full Briefing here, or via the content libraries on Viewpoint and Governance Hub.

READ MORE »

The Golden Revolving Door

Lauren H. Cohen is the L. E. Simmons Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School. This post is based on a working paper by Professor Cohen, Professor Ling Cen, Professor Jing Wu, and Mr. Fan Zhang.

Summary

In the dynamic landscape of today’s interconnected global economy, geopolitical disruptions can send shockwaves along global supply chains through international trade. While many firms struggle to navigate these turbulent waters, some manage to sail smoothly—and even thrive. The secret? Our latest research discovers that government connections, especially those established by recruiting ex-government employees, play an important role in hedging geopolitical risks. Our research paper (Cen, Cohen, Wu, & Zhang, 2023) explores how firms with strong government connections leverage these relationships to gain a strategic advantage during major trade disruptions such as the US-China trade war and the Russia-Ukraine conflict. By uncovering the economic mechanisms underpinning this phenomenon, we provide insights for the value of human capital investment in government connections under geopolitical uncertainties.

READ MORE »

Time to rethink performance shares?

Ola Peter Gjessing is a Lead Investment Stewardship Manager at Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM). This post is based on his NBIM memorandum.

Time to rethink performance shares?

This is the year that the two leading proxy advisors separately ask clients whether to abandon their favoring of CEO ‘performance shares’ over simpler stock incentives. That is significant because both Institutional Investor Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis for years have heralded three-year performance metrics for equity grants as a measure of good compensation practices. The problem is that it does not seem to work. And it does seem to be expensive.

ISS and Glass Lewis should be commended for listening to concerned investors, like ourselves, and openly inviting views on the merits of simpler, more transparent and longer-term equity grants as replacement for popular but complex performance-conditioned grants. Both agencies have transparently published their consultations online, for which they also deserve credit. See ISS’ Annual Global Benchmark Policy Survey (questions 15-20) and Glass Lewis’ 2024 Investor Client Policy Survey (question 22).

READ MORE »

Page 25 of 78
1 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 78