Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

“Say on Pay” Shareholder Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

Our firm has recently released a new M&A Commentary on proposals requiring an annual shareholder vote on executive compensation, known as “Say on Pay” proposals, that many public companies are likely to face during the 2008 proxy season. The Commentary, entitled “Say on Pay” Shareholder Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation: The New Frontier of Corporate […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , | Comments Off on “Say on Pay” Shareholder Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

SEC Votes to Permit Exclusion of Shareholder Proxy Access Proposals

The SEC’s vote affirming the exclusion of stockholder proposals seeking access to the company’s proxy to run a director election proxy fight has drawn this short and sweet applause from the attorneys most involved in the fight at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz.

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , | Comments Off on SEC Votes to Permit Exclusion of Shareholder Proxy Access Proposals

RiskMetrics’ Martha Carter on Activism and Governance

Martha Carter, who heads the design of corporate governance policies at RiskMetrics, recently gave a presentation at the Shareholder Activism class here at Harvard Law School. In her talk, Carter offered an assessment of last year’s proxy season; the issues likely to arise during the coming proxy season; and an account of the issues receiving the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Program News & Events | Tagged , | Comments Off on RiskMetrics’ Martha Carter on Activism and Governance

Commissioner Nazareth Speaks on Today’s SEC Vote

The SEC today voted 3-1 to adopt a rule permitting companies to exclude from the corporate proxy shareholder proposals on ballot access for director elections. Although the text of the final rule is not yet available, the SEC has released a forceful speech by the lone dissenter, Commissioner Annette Nazareth, expressing her disappointment in the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

GAAP in Peril

Effective corporate governance requires reliable and consistent financial statements. Investors depend upon auditors to verify what management has done each year in innumerable corporate transactions. For decades, the American generally-accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have admirably and ably provided reliable reporting on a vast array of modern business situations. Yet a serious drive to eliminate American […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Chancery Orders Production of Records for Periods Prior to Stock Ownership

The Delaware Court of Chancery issued a decision last week of both practical and theoretical importance for corporate lawyers. The opinion is Melzer v. CNET Networks, Inc., and there are at least three reasons why this case is noteworthy. First, the court held that Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which is the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Derivatives, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Corporate Governance Objectives of Labor Union Shareholders

The SEC has been considering the issue of increased shareholder access to the corporate proxy and director elections. Labor union pension funds have been among the more vocal proponents of increased access, arguing that such access will lead to improved financial performance. Business groups, such as the Business Roundtable, have argued against increased access on […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Empirical Research, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Study of Majority Voting in Director Elections

We have recently released the November 2007 edition of the Study of Majority Voting in Director Elections, which demonstrates that majority voting for the election of directors, which has been characterized by its advocates as a tool for increasing director accountability, has become the prevailing election standard among large, public companies. As issuers prepare for […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Empirical Research, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Public Enforcement of Securities Laws: Preliminary Evidence

I recently presented my new discussion paper with Mark Roe, Public Enforcement of Securities Laws: Preliminary Evidence, at the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies at the New York University School of Law. The paper develops a measure of securities-enforcement intensity and examines financial outcomes worldwide in light of enforcement activity. The abstract of the paper […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, HLS Research, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Public Enforcement of Securities Laws: Preliminary Evidence

Programmed Stock Trading Plans Eyed

Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from Jonathan Hayter of the National Law Journal. The National Law Journal recently published Programmed Stock Trading Plans Eyed, which highlights recent efforts by corporate boards to ensure that executives’ stock-trading plans meet the requirements of Rule 10b5-1. That Rule permits firms to trade the company’s stock for […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Programmed Stock Trading Plans Eyed