-
Supported By:


Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Has SOX Made New York Less Competitive in Global Markets?
In a paper entitled Has New York Become Less Competitive in Global Markets? Evaluating Foreign Listing Choices Over Time, Craig Doidge, G. Andrew Karolyi, and I show that Sarbanes-Oxley (“SOX”) cannot be blamed for the decrease in foreign listings on the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ. A recent revision of the paper, posted here, […]
Click here to read the complete postConservative Tilt or Shareholder Victory? The Supreme Court of the United States and Tellabs v. Makor
Editor’s Note: This post is from J. Robert Brown, Jr. of the University of Denver Sturm College of Law. Much has been written about the conservative shift at the Supreme Court; among other things, there is the perception that the Court is taking an increasingly pro-business approach in its decisions. As an example, commentators often […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Op-Eds & Opinions, Securities Regulation
Tagged Class actions, Makor v. Tellabs, Securities litigation, Supreme Court
Comments Off on Conservative Tilt or Shareholder Victory? The Supreme Court of the United States and Tellabs v. Makor
Supreme Court Enforces Strict Pleading Standard for Private Securities Actions
Warren Stern, John Savarese, George Conway, and Garrett Moritz of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz have released this Memorandum assessing the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. In Tellabs, the Memo explains, “[s]ecurities class action defendants . . . won an important battle in the fight against meritless […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Class actions, Makor v. Tellabs, Securities litigation, Supreme Court
Comments Off on Supreme Court Enforces Strict Pleading Standard for Private Securities Actions
The Aardvark in the Boardroom
Editor’s Note: This post is from Joseph Hinsey of Harvard Business School. Okay–that was a shameless play on the classic elephant metaphor. But perhaps it’s a worthwhile way to remind us (once again?) of a fundamental issue long embedded in the corporate governance dialogue about shareholder rights and “shareholder democracy.” That issue is called to […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Op-Eds & Opinions
Tagged Boards of Directors, Shareholder power, Shareholder proposals
Comments Off on The Aardvark in the Boardroom
Disney’s Board Adopts a Bylaw Amendment Based on My Proposal
Editor’s Note: This post is from Lucian Bebchuk of Harvard Law School. The Board of Directors of the Walt Disney Company has adopted a bylaw amendment based on a revision of a proposal that I submitted last fall and which won 57% of the votes cast at Disney’s last annual meeting. Although my proposal fell […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Program News & Events
Tagged Charter & bylaws, Disney, Shareholder proposals
Comments Off on Disney’s Board Adopts a Bylaw Amendment Based on My Proposal
A Delaware Deal Law Two-Fer: Topps and Lear
Two opinions within 24 hours is enough to exhaust anyone. Two important decisions on the interaction of Delaware deal law and private equity deals requires the stamina only high caffeination can sustain. But here we have it: a true two-fer. This Memorandum describes the implications of these cases in detail.
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Delaware cases, Delaware law, In re Lear, In re Topps, Private equity
Comments Off on A Delaware Deal Law Two-Fer: Topps and Lear
Vice Chancellor Strine in the Journal of Corporation Law
Editor’s Note: This post is from Hillary Sale of the University of Iowa College of Law. This post is part of the Delaware law series, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available here. The University of Iowa College of Law’s Journal of Corporation […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Op-Eds & Opinions, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Delaware articles, Delaware law, General governance
Comments Off on Vice Chancellor Strine in the Journal of Corporation Law
CEOs Under Academic Fire
The National Journal has just published a long piece, CEOs Under Fire, by John Maggs, which reviews in detail the academic work on executive compensation by Lucian Bebchuk, Erik Lie, and Xavier Gabaix. The piece runs as follows: On March 13, after meeting with President Bush, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales faced the cameras and gave […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, HLS Research, Op-Eds & Opinions
Tagged Executive Compensation
1 Comment
Topps and Lear: Another View of the Cathedral
Latham & Watkins has recently issued this Client Alert on Vice Chancellor Strine‘s recent decisions in Topps and Lear. These two new opinions, also covered here and here, offer critical guidance to directors going through the acquisition process, and particularly boards contemplating going-private transactions. The Alert offers clients a number of considerations to guide deal […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Delaware cases, Delaware law, In re Lear, In re Topps
Comments Off on Topps and Lear: Another View of the Cathedral
Topps and Bottoms: A Dubious Performance By Dissident Directors
Vice Chancellor Leo Strine last week produced another wonderfully detailed and thoughtful opinion, this time in In re The Topps Company Shareholders Litigation, the case challenging the proposed sale of Topps (think baseball cards) to a private equity firm run by Michael Eisner (think Disney). There are already a number of descriptions and comments on […]
Click here to read the complete post