Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

You Say Ph.D., I Say Toast

For those interested in the vigorous debate among academics and practitioners on the virtues and vices of shareholder activism, Part V of Storming the Castle, Lawdragon‘s recent profile on the discussion panels held last year here at Harvard as part of Professor Robert Clark‘s and Vice Chancellor Leo Strine‘s course Mergers, Acquisitions, and Split-Ups, is […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, HLS Research | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Creditors Cannot Bring Direct Claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty–But Substantial Questions Remain

In North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Gheewalla, the Delaware Supreme Court, in a case of first impression, provided some clarity on the controversial issue of whether and to what extent creditors have the ability to assert fiduciary duty claims against directors.  The Supreme Court held, unequivocally, that “creditors of a Delaware corporation […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Creditors Cannot Bring Direct Claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty–But Substantial Questions Remain

Shareholder Activists Risk Destroying Board Effectiveness

David A. Katz and Laura A. McIntosh of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz have released this Memorandum detailing several proxy-access and executive-compensation proposals voted on during this year’s proxy season.  The Memorandum offers a highly insightful analysis of the effects of shareholder activism on corporate governance, concluding that “the specific interventions that are the subject […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Shareholder Activists Risk Destroying Board Effectiveness

Go Dick! Smile.

Lawdragon‘s recent six-part profile on the corporate law curriculum at Harvard, Storming the Castle, has offered readers fascinating insights on a series of panel discussions sponsored by the Program on Corporate Governance and hosted here in Cambridge as part of Mergers, Acquisitions, and Split-Ups, a new course taught by Professor Robert Clark and Vice Chancellor […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions, Program News & Events | Tagged , | Comments Off on Go Dick! Smile.

Michael Jensen’s New Work on Integrity

Michael Jensen has a new work on integrity. Co-authored with Werner Erhard and Steve Zaffron, the work is titled Integrity: a Positive Model that Incorporates the Normative Phenomena of Morality, Ethics and Legality. (This link is to the authors’ PowerPoint presentation on the subject which is available on SSRN; the paper itself wil be publicly […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Corporate Social Responsibility, HLS Research | Tagged | Comments Off on Michael Jensen’s New Work on Integrity

A Friendly Tale of Hot Dogs and Trainwrecks

As I mentioned last week, Lawdragon has recently published a six-part profile, Storming the Castle, that describes the innovative integration of insights from practice into the newest corporate law course offerings here at Harvard.  The profile emphasizes how Professor Robert Clark and Vice Chancellor Leo Strine, who last year co-taught Mergers, Acquisitions, and Split-Ups, populated […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Program News & Events | Tagged , | Comments Off on A Friendly Tale of Hot Dogs and Trainwrecks

Response: Bringing Directors and Stockowners Together

I can’t help but post a brief response to Carl Olson’s recent post about allowing shareholders to directly communicate with directors. Although I agree that many companies should be doing a better job of ensuring that directors hear the perspective of shareholders–and even hear directly from shareholders under certain circumstances–I think it is unreasonable and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , | Comments Off on Response: Bringing Directors and Stockowners Together

Bebchuk’s “Case for Increasing Shareholder Power”: An Opposition

Paul Rowe, William Savitt, and I have just released Bebchuk’s “Case for Increasing Shareholder Power”: An Opposition.  The Article argues that the sweeping changes in corporate law proposed in Lucian Bebchuk‘s The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power–in particular, vesting in shareholders the power to change the company’s charter and to authorize mergers–represent radical, risky changes […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, HLS Research, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Bebchuk’s “Case for Increasing Shareholder Power”: An Opposition

Storming the Castle

Lawdragon has just published Storming the Castle, a six-part profile on the sweeping curricular changes that have generated unprecedented participation by practitioners in the newest offerings in corporate law coursework here at Harvard.  The profile offers a detailed look at Mergers, Acquisitions, and Split-Ups, a course co-taught by Professor Robert Clark and Vice Chancellor Leo […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in HLS Research, Mergers & Acquisitions, Program News & Events | Tagged , | Comments Off on Storming the Castle

Bringing Directors and Stockowners Together

Corporate governance theory states that the directors of corporations represent the interests of stockowners.  But in practice directors are prevented from hearing from individual stockowners and their views on corporate matters.  Conscientious fulfillment of corporate duties is obviously impaired. Longstanding corporate policies intentionally erect barriers for avenues of direct communication from stockowners to directors.  It’s […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , | 3 Comments