-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- William Ackman
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- John Finley
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper
- Paul Hilal
- Carl Icahn William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
- Daniel Wolf
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Guiding Principles of Good Governance
The Global Network of Director Institutes (GNDI), the international network of director institutes, has issued a new perspectives paper to guide boards in looking at governance beyond legislative mandates. The Guiding Principles of Good Governance were developed by GNDI as part of its commitment to provide leadership on governance issues for directors of all organisations […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board independence, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, Corporate governance, Governance standards, International governance
Comments Off on Guiding Principles of Good Governance
Dealing with Director Compensation
Due to a recent Delaware Chancery Court ruling, the topic of director compensation currently is facing an uncharacteristic turn in the spotlight. Though it receives relatively little attention compared to its higher-profile cousin—executive compensation—director compensation can be a difficult issue for boards if not handled thoughtfully. Determining the appropriate form and amount of compensation for […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board leadership, Boards of Directors, Compensation committees, Compensation consultants, Conflicts of interest, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Director compensation, Equity-based compensation, Fairness review, Fiduciary duties, Peer groups, Shareholder suits, Special committees
Comments Off on Dealing with Director Compensation
Delaware Court: Compensation Awards to Directors Subject to Entire Fairness
In Calma v. Templeton, the plaintiff alleged that a board of directors breached their fiduciary duties in awarding themselves restricted stock units (RSUs) pursuant to a stockholder-approved equity incentive compensation plan. The Court of Chancery held on a motion to dismiss that (i) the directors were interested in the award of the RSUs, and (ii) […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Derivative suits, Equity-based compensation, Fairness review, Fiduciary duties
Comments Off on Delaware Court: Compensation Awards to Directors Subject to Entire Fairness
Human Rights Through A Corporate Governance Lens
Human rights [1] are attracting increasing attention from a corporate governance perspective as a dimension of both business ethics and enterprise risk management for companies. Indeed, the ethical and risk dimensions are in many ways intertwined, insofar as ethical lapses or inattention to human rights practices by companies may not only breach the human rights […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Compliance & ethics, Corporate governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Due diligence, Environmental disclosure, Human rights, Institutional Investors, OECD, Public perception, Reputation
Comments Off on Human Rights Through A Corporate Governance Lens
Modernizing and Enhancing Investment Company and Investment Adviser Reporting
Good morning, everyone. This is an open meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2015 under the Government in the Sunshine Act. The Commission today will consider two recommendations of the staff to modernize and augment the information reported by both registered investment companies, which include mutual funds and ETFs, and investment […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Disclosure, Investment advisers, Investor protection, Reporting regulation, Risk oversight, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Transparency
Comments Off on Modernizing and Enhancing Investment Company and Investment Adviser Reporting
Effective Regulatory Oversight and Investor Protection Requires Better Information
It is said that, “knowledge is power.” Knowledge, however, requires information. And there is no doubt we live in an age of information. The advent of the Internet and the breathtaking technological advances we have witnessed over the last few decades have given us access to more information than at any time in history. The […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Private Equity, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Disclosure, Investment advisers, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Reporting regulation, Risk oversight, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Transparency
Comments Off on Effective Regulatory Oversight and Investor Protection Requires Better Information
The Importance of Merger Price and Process in Delaware Appraisal Actions
On April 30, 2015, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a post-trial opinion in which it rejected an attempt by dissenting shareholders to extract extra consideration for their shares above the merger price through appraisal rights. See Merlin Partners LP v. AutoInfo, Inc., Slip. Op. Apr. 30, 2015, Case No. 8509-VCN (Del. Ch. Apr. 30, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fair values, Firm valuation, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on The Importance of Merger Price and Process in Delaware Appraisal Actions
More than 300 Research Papers Have Applied the Entrenchment Index of Bebchuk, Cohen and Ferrell (2009)
As of May 2015, more than 300 research studies have applied the Entrenchment Index put forward in a study published by Lucian Bebchuk, Alma Cohen and Allen Ferrell, What Matters in Corporate Governance. The papers using the Entrenchment Index, including many papers in leading journals in law, economics and finance, are listed here. The Bebchuk-Cohen-Ferrell […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, HLS Research
Tagged Corporate governance, Entrenchment, Firm valuation, Governance indices, IRRC Institute
Comments Off on More than 300 Research Papers Have Applied the Entrenchment Index of Bebchuk, Cohen and Ferrell (2009)
DuPont’s Victory in the Proxy Fight with Trian
On May 13, 2015, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, a major chemical company with a market cap of approximately $68 billion, defeated a proxy campaign run by Trian Fund Management, L.P., the activist fund led by Nelson Peltz that owns approximately 2.7% of DuPont. Trian was seeking four seats on DuPont’s board […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on DuPont’s Victory in the Proxy Fight with Trian
Delaware Court Strengthens Protections for Independent Directors
The Delaware Supreme Court held last week that a plaintiff seeking monetary damages from an independent, disinterested director protected by an exculpatory charter provision must specifically plead a non-exculpated claim against the director to survive a motion to dismiss. [1] This rule applies regardless of the standard of review applied to the board’s conduct in […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board independence, Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, DGCL, Fiduciary duties, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Special committees
Comments Off on Delaware Court Strengthens Protections for Independent Directors