-
Supported By:


Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Supreme Court: Fiduciaries Must Monitor Offered 401(k) Investment Alternatives
On May 18, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Tibble v. Edison International that fiduciaries of 401(k) retirement plans have a continuing duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to monitor an investment alternative offered under a 401(k) plan after it is selected. In monitoring an investment alternative, the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Due diligence, ERISA, Fiduciary duties, Investment advisers, Pension funds, Prudence, Retirement plans, Supreme Court
Comments Off on Supreme Court: Fiduciaries Must Monitor Offered 401(k) Investment Alternatives
SEC Re-Proposes Rules on Arranging, Negotiating or Executing Security-Based Swaps
On May 13, 2015, the SEC published proposed amendments and re-proposed rules on the application of certain Title VII requirements to cross-border security-based swap activities of non-U.S. persons based on U.S. conduct. The proposed rules would modify numerous prior SEC proposals and final rules, including the May 2013 proposed rules on the cross-border application of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Derivatives, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Broker-dealers, CFTC, Cross-border transactions, Derivatives, International governance, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Swaps, Swaps entities
Comments Off on SEC Re-Proposes Rules on Arranging, Negotiating or Executing Security-Based Swaps
Regulation A+ Takes Effect
On June 19, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) recently adopted rule amendments to Regulation A under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act)—colloquially known as “Regulation A+”—took effect. Regulation A is intended to ease the burden of Securities Act registration for small public offerings. These rule amendments, among other things, increase the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Disclosure, EDGAR, Filings, IPOs, Registration exemptions, Regulation A, Reporting regulation, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Act, Securities regulation, Small firms, Solicitation
Comments Off on Regulation A+ Takes Effect
Volcker Rule: Agencies Release New Guidance
[June 12, 2015], the staffs of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (collectively, the “Agencies”) provided two important additions to their existing list of Frequently […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Banks, CFTC, FDIC, Federal Reserve, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Hedge funds, OCC, Private equity, Private funds, Proprietary trading, SEC, Securities regulation, Volcker Rule
Comments Off on Volcker Rule: Agencies Release New Guidance
Shareholder Activism and Executive Compensation
In today’s environment in which all public companies—no matter their size, industry, or performance—are potential targets of shareholder activists, companies should review their compensation programs with an eye toward making sure that the programs take into account the potential effects of the current wave of shareholder activism. In this regard, we have provided below some […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Change in control, Executive Compensation, Management, Pay for performance, Say on pay, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Shareholder Activism and Executive Compensation
Governance Challenges Arising From “Corporate Cooperation” Concepts
The current Department of Justice emphasis on “corporate cooperation” in the context of government investigations creates the potential for significant tension to arise between governance and executive leadership, which potential should be recognized and addressed proactively by the board. The DOJ Criminal Division has, with notable frequency this spring, sought to increase public transparency as […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accountability, Audit committee, Boards of Directors, Compliance & ethics, Corporate crime, DOJ, General counsel, Management, Misconduct, Risk management
Comments Off on Governance Challenges Arising From “Corporate Cooperation” Concepts
Quality Data and the Power of Prevention
As many of you know, I care passionately about the success of the Legal Entity Identifier (or LEI). With the financial crisis in the rear view mirror, it is sometimes easy to forget the forces that converged in 2007 and harmed both our financial markets and our economy. The events of 2008 are indelibly etched […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Financial crisis, Globalization, International governance, Reporting regulation, Risk management, SEC
Comments Off on Quality Data and the Power of Prevention
New DGCL Amendments Endorse Forum Selection Clauses and Prohibit Fee-Shifting
As expected, the Delaware State Legislature approved amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) that will (i) authorize forum selection clauses in the charters or bylaws of Delaware corporations specifying Delaware as an exclusive forum for litigating internal corporate claims, (ii) prohibit clauses designating only courts outside of Delaware as the exclusive forum for […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Attorneys' fees, Charter & bylaws, Delaware law, DGCL, Fee-Shifting, Forum selection, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on New DGCL Amendments Endorse Forum Selection Clauses and Prohibit Fee-Shifting
Audit Committees: 2015 Mid-Year Issues Update
Board audit committee agendas continue to evolve as companies are faced with a rapidly-changing global business landscape, the proliferation of standards and regulations, increased stakeholder scrutiny, and a heightened enforcement environment. In this post, I summarize current issues of interest for audit committees. The Audit Committee And Oversight During her remarks at the Stanford Directors’ […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accounting, Accounting standards, Audit committee, Boards of Directors, Cybersecurity, Disclosure, External auditors, Financial reporting, GAAP, IASB, IFRS, Internal auditors, Internal control, Oversight, PCAOB, Risk oversight, SEC, Shareholder activism, Whistleblowers
Comments Off on Audit Committees: 2015 Mid-Year Issues Update
NY Court: RMBS Statute of Limitations Runs from Time of Securitization
In an important decision for financial institutions and investors in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), the New York Court of Appeals unanimously ruled yesterday (June 11, 2015) that claims for breach of representations and warranties made in an RMBS securitization accrue when the representations and warranties are made, which typically occurs when the securitization closes. ACE […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Asset-backed securities, Contracts, Mortgage lending, New York, Securities litigation, Securitization, State law, Statute of limitations
Comments Off on NY Court: RMBS Statute of Limitations Runs from Time of Securitization