Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Corporate Governance and Diversity

Earlier this year, Germany joined the ranks of countries such as Norway, France, Italy, Belgium, and Iceland by enacting a quota to increase the number of women in its corporate boardrooms. Starting in 2016, both genders must make-up at least 30 percent of specified German companies’ supervisory boards. The news from Germany provoked decidedly negative reactions in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Corporate Governance and Diversity

Foreign Antitakeover Regimes

The confluence of a number of overlapping factors—including an uptick in global and cross-border M&A activity, a resurgence in unsolicited takeover offers, the continued flow of tax inversion transactions, and the growth of activism in non-U.S. markets—means that U.S. companies and investors are more often facing unfamiliar takeover (and antitakeover) regimes as they evaluate and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Foreign Antitakeover Regimes

A Reassessment of the Clearing Mandate

Following the financial crisis, the G-20 nations committed to a raft of reforms for swap markets. These reforms are intended to mitigate systemic risk, and with it, the damage that failing financial institutions inflict on the financial sector and the broader economy. A core component of the reforms is the introduction of the “clearing mandate” […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Derivatives, Financial Crisis, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Reassessment of the Clearing Mandate

Proxy Access: Best Practices

The Council of Institutional Investors (CII) believes that proxy access is a fundamental right of longterm shareowners. Proxy access—a mechanism that enables shareowners to place their nominees for director on a company’s proxy card—gives shareowners a meaningful voice in board elections. CII’s members-approved policy on proxy access states, in part:

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Proxy Access: Best Practices

CII on Proxy Access

[On August 5, 2015] the Council of Institutional Investors (“CII”), a nonprofit association of corporate, public and union employee benefit funds and endowments that seeks to promote effective corporate governance practices for U.S. companies and strong shareholder rights and protections, published a report titled “Proxy Access: Best Practices” that describes CII’s views on seven provisions […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on CII on Proxy Access

Securities Class Action Filings—2015 Midyear Assessment

Plaintiffs brought 85 new federal class action securities cases in the first half of 2015, according to Securities Class Action Filings—2015 Midyear Assessment, a report compiled by Cornerstone Research and the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse. This represents a decrease from the second half of 2014, when plaintiffs filed 92 securities class actions. The […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Empirical Research, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Securities Class Action Filings—2015 Midyear Assessment

D.C. Circuit Upholds Privilege For Internal Investigation Documents

Earlier this week, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals for the second time granted a writ of mandamus and vacated district court orders that would have provided for the disclosure of privileged documents created in the course of a company’s internal investigation. In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., No. 14-5319 (Aug. 11, 2015). As noted […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on D.C. Circuit Upholds Privilege For Internal Investigation Documents

SEC Adopts CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule

On August 5, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), by a 3-2 vote, adopted rule amendments [1] to implement Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires public companies to disclose the “pay ratio” between its CEO’s annual total compensation and the median annual total compensation of all other employees of the company. [2] The pay […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SEC Adopts CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule

An Interview with Chief Justice Strine

As your predecessor Chief Justice Myron Steele was stepping down in 2013, Directorship asked him if he had any words of advice for his successor. Chief Justice Steele suggested that his successor be prepared for crisis management because you never know what’s going to happen. So, I’m curious: have you had a crisis so far? […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Op-Eds & Opinions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on An Interview with Chief Justice Strine

Special Meeting Proposals

Shareholders petitioning the board for the special meeting right propose either to create the right or, in circumstances where the right already exists, to lower the minimum share ownership threshold required to exercise the right. As of June 30, 2015, 339 companies in the S&P 500 and Fortune 500 already provided their shareholders with the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Special Meeting Proposals