-
Supported By:


Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Disclosure of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Companies commonly supplement their reported earnings under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) with non-GAAP financial measures that they believe more accurately reflect their results of operations or financial position or that are commonly used by investors to evaluate performance. A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s historical or future financial […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accounting, Compliance & ethics, Disclosure, Exchange Act, Financial reporting, GAAP, Public firms, Regulation G, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Disclosure of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Shackling Short Sellers: The 2008 Shorting Ban
In September 2008, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) temporarily banned most short sales in nearly 1,000 financial stocks. In our paper, Shackling Short Sellers: The 2008 Shorting Ban, forthcoming in the Review of Financial Studies, we examine the ban’s effect on market quality, shorting activity, the aggressiveness of short sellers, and stock prices. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Financial Crisis, Securities Regulation
Tagged Financial crisis, Liquidity, SEC, Securities regulation, Short sales
Comments Off on Shackling Short Sellers: The 2008 Shorting Ban
SRP Mid-Proxy-Season Results: 19 Boards Declassified, 13 Precatory Declassification Proposals Passed
Editor’s Note: Lucian Bebchuk is the Director of the Shareholder Rights Project (SRP), Scott Hirst is the SRP’s Associate Director, and June Rhee is Counsel at the SRP. The SRP, a clinical program operating at Harvard Law School, works on behalf of public pension funds and charitable organizations seeking to improve corporate governance at publicly […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, HLS Research, Institutional Investors
Tagged Classified boards, Florida SBA, Institutional Investors, Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association, North Carolina State Treasurer, Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, Precatory proposals, PRIM, School Employees Retirement System of Ohio, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder Rights Project, Staggered boards
Comments Off on SRP Mid-Proxy-Season Results: 19 Boards Declassified, 13 Precatory Declassification Proposals Passed
The Case for an Unbiased Takeover Law
Takeovers remain the most controversial corporate governance mechanism. According to pro-takeover commentators, takeovers are generally beneficial for corporate governance. Takeovers can displace poorly performing managers and facilitate corporate restructuring. From this perspective, regulation should encourage takeovers. On the opposite side of the debate, those who oppose hostile takeovers argue that they can disrupt well-functioning companies […]
Click here to read the complete postExit Consents in Restructurings – Still a Viable Option?
Exit consents are often used as a restructuring tool by issuers of bonds. Issuers invite bondholders to exchange their existing bonds for new bonds (usually with a lower principal amount). In order to participate in the exchange, bondholders must agree to vote in favour of a resolution that amends the terms of the existing bonds […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Banks, Bondholders, Bonds, Covenants, International governance, Majority voting, Restructurings, UK
Comments Off on Exit Consents in Restructurings – Still a Viable Option?
Risk in the Boardroom
In a Director Note recently published, The Conference Board reviews current corporate practices on risk oversight by members of the board of directors of U.S. public companies. The study is based on findings from a survey of 359 SEC-registered business corporations conducted by The Conference Board in collaboration with NASDAQ OMX and NYSE Euronext. Data […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Audit committee, Boards of Directors, Management, Public firms, Risk committee, Risk management, Risk oversight, The Conference Board
Comments Off on Risk in the Boardroom
The Non-Expert Agency: Using the SEC to Regulate Partisan Politics
The regulation of political speech, including the regulation of contributions and spending, is one of the most constitutionally delicate operations in which the government can engage. As the Supreme Court stated in Buckley v. Valeo, “[Political] contribution and expenditure limitations operate in an area of the most fundamental First Amendment activities. . . . [T]he […]
Click here to read the complete post2013 Women on Boards Survey
GMI Ratings’ 2013 Women on Boards survey includes data on 5,977 companies in 45 countries around the world. The results show that progress on most measures of female representation continues to be slow. Women now hold 11% of board seats at the world’s largest and best-known companies, up 0.5 percentage points from a year ago […]
Click here to read the complete postThe Relation between Equity Incentives and Misreporting
A large body of prior literature examines the relation between managerial equity incentives and financial misreporting but reports mixed results. This literature argues that a manager whose wealth is more sensitive to changes in stock price has a greater incentive to misreport. However, if managers are risk-averse and misreporting increases both equity values and equity […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation
Tagged Equity offerings, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Management, Misreporting, Risk-taking
Comments Off on The Relation between Equity Incentives and Misreporting
SEC Comment Letter: Shining Light on Corporate Political Spending
We recently submitted a comment letter in connection with a rulemaking petition, currently before the SEC, urging the development of rules to require public companies to disclose the use of corporate resources for political activities. The Petition was submitted by the Committee on Disclosure of Corporate Political Spending, a group of ten corporate and securities […]
Click here to read the complete post