Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Curbing Excessive CEO Pay by Disentangling Wall Street and Corporate America

Peter Drucker, the revered management guru, deplored excessive CEO pay. He argued that CEOs should not be paid more than 20 to 25 times the average salary of company employees. While his approach is schematic, Drucker’s reasons for opposing high executive compensation resonate today even more than during his lifetime. Essentially, Drucker believed that the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Financial Crisis, Op-Eds & Opinions | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Equity-Debtholder Conflicts and Capital Structure

In the paper, Equity-Debtholder Conflicts and Capital Structure, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we present a novel approach to identifying debt‐equity conflicts and the associated agency costs, employing a 1991 legal event as a natural experiment. Our natural experiment revolves around the fiduciary duties of corporate officers. Broadly speaking, these duties require […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Empirical Research | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Equity-Debtholder Conflicts and Capital Structure

The Most Influential People in Corporate Governance

A review of the most recent Directorship 100 list – a list of the most influential people in corporate governance put together each year by Directorship magazine – indicates that individuals affiliated with Harvard Law School and its Program on Corporate Governance play a central role in the corporate governance landscape. The Directorship 100 list […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Program News & Events | Tagged | Comments Off on The Most Influential People in Corporate Governance

Court Dismisses Madoff-Related Class Action as Preempted

In a decision with substantial implications for class action suits arising out of Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme and other fraud cases, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York threw out a class action against Union Bancaire Privée, which advised funds of funds with allocations to Madoff feeder funds. Barron v. […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Financial Crisis, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Court Dismisses Madoff-Related Class Action as Preempted

Convertible Bond Arbitrageurs as Suppliers of Capital

In the paper, Convertible Bond Arbitrageurs as Suppliers of Capital, which is forthcoming in the Review of Financial Studies, we investigate the role of convertible bond arbitrageurs as suppliers of capital. Convertible bonds have been an important source of financing for a wide variety of firms and have been particularly popular among distressed firms with […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Convertible Bond Arbitrageurs as Suppliers of Capital

Is “Pay-to-Play” Driving Public Pension Fund Activism in Securities Class Actions?

Public pension funds have played a prominent role in securities class actions, comprising nearly half of all institutional investor lead plaintiffs. Overall, prior research has shown that the funds perform admirably in the lead plaintiff role, increasing recoveries for the class of defrauded shareholders, improving corporate governance, enhancing the independence of the board, and lowering […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Paid to Fail

In a report just filed with the United States court that is overseeing the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, a court-appointed examiner described how Lehman’s executives made deliberate decisions to pursue an aggressive investment strategy, take on greater risks, and substantially increase leverage. Were these decisions the result of hubris and errors in judgment or the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Financial Crisis, Financial Regulation, HLS Research, Op-Eds & Opinions | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

RiskMetrics’ Introduces New Governance Measurement for Proxy Voting Reports

RiskMetrics Group has recently overhauled its core corporate governance yardstick. Highlights for U.S. companies: The Corporate Governance Quotient (CGQ), which for the past several years has ranked companies, both within their industry and on a broader basis, according to their overall adherence to RMG’s notions of governance best practices, is being discontinued as of June […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , | 1 Comment

“No Mas” to “Just Say No”?

The current takeover battle between Airgas and Air Products highlights one of the key areas of uncertainty in Delaware law today—the continued vitality of the “just say no” defense to unsolicited advances. Stated simply, if upheld, the “just say no” defense allows the board of directors of a target company to combine a refusal to […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on “No Mas” to “Just Say No”?

The Effects of Executives on Corporate Tax Avoidance

In the paper, The Effects of Executives on Corporate Tax Avoidance, which is forthcoming in the Accounting Review, we investigate whether individual executives have an effect on their firm’s tax avoidance that cannot be explained by characteristics of the firm. Despite decades of empirical research in corporate taxation, little attention has been focused on whether […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research | Tagged | 1 Comment