Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

The International Dimension of Issuer Liability

In the upcoming decision Morrison v. National Australia Bank, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide on a ‘foreign-cubed’ securities class action for the first time. The case involves only foreign plaintiffs, who bought their shares on a foreign (Australian) exchange, and sued an Australian issuer. Because the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Regulation | Tagged , | Comments Off on The International Dimension of Issuer Liability

Trend Spotting — Are Courts Becoming Less Friendly to Distress Investors?

When the Bankruptcy Code was enacted in 1978, it embodied a bias in favor of reorganization of going concerns wherever possible. This has been the singular distinction between the “American style” of restructurings and the approach used in most other commercial countries. The very concept of “debtor-in-possession” suggests a belief in the chance of renewal […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged | 1 Comment

SEC Proposes Limits on Options Market Access Fees

In an action that potentially affects the business models of the U.S. options exchanges and major option market participants, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) recently issued a proposal that would cap exchange “access fees” for listed options and also prohibit exchanges from imposing unfairly discriminatory terms that inhibit access to quotations in listed […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Comments Off on SEC Proposes Limits on Options Market Access Fees

Lying and Getting Caught

In our paper, Lying and Getting Caught: An Empirical Study of the Effect of Securities Class Action Settlements on Targeted Firms [Lynn Bai, James D. Cox & Randall S. Thomas, Lying and Getting Caught:  An Empirical Study of the Effect of Securities Class Action Settlements on Targeted Firms, 158 U. Pa. L. Rev. (forthcoming July 2010)], we […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | 1 Comment

SEC Proposes Large Trader Reporting System

On April 14, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) proposed a new rule to establish a large trader reporting system. [1] The rule would require large traders of exchange-listed stocks and options (“NMS securities”) to register with the SEC and obtain a unique large trader identification number, which they would provide to their […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Comments Off on SEC Proposes Large Trader Reporting System

UK Passes Strict New Bribery Act

Earlier this year, we noted that other countries, in addition to the United States, are increasing their efforts to combat international bribery and corruption. (See “Increasing International Cooperation and Other Key Trends in Anti-Corruption Investigations“). In a further reflection of this trend, on April 8, 2010, the United Kingdom passed the Bribery Act 2010 (read […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications | Comments Off on UK Passes Strict New Bribery Act

The New Enhanced Proxy Disclosure Rules – Ready, Set, Change and NOW

The SEC’s new enhanced proxy disclosure rules, requiring disclosure concerning (1) board leadership structure and qualifications, (2) risk and risk oversight and (3) compensation issues, were adopted in response to “investors’ . . . increasing[] focus[] on corporate accountability” in the wake of the financial crisis. But almost as important as the substance of the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Op-Eds & Opinions, Practitioner Publications | Comments Off on The New Enhanced Proxy Disclosure Rules – Ready, Set, Change and NOW

Court Protects Insurance Brokers’ Communications If Used To Render Legal Advice

On April 5, 2010, the Southern District of Texas issued a decision in In re Tetra Technologies, Inc., No. 4:08-cv-0965, 2010 WL 1335431 (S.D.Tex. April 5, 2010), on the question of whether communications between a company’s employees, its counsel and its insurance brokers were protected as attorney-client communications. The District Court held that as long […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Comments Off on Court Protects Insurance Brokers’ Communications If Used To Render Legal Advice

Goldman Sachs: Being “Legal” Doesn’t Make It “Right”

Editor’s Note: Ben W. Heineman, Jr. is a former GE senior vice president for law and public affairs and a senior fellow at Harvard University’s schools of law and government. This post is based on an article that first appeared in the online edition of the Washington Post. Great companies have to distinguish between what […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Crisis, Financial Regulation, Op-Eds & Opinions, Securities Regulation | 2 Comments

Paying for Long-Term Performance

How should equity-based plans be designed to tie executive payoffs to long-term performance? This question has been receiving much attention from firms, investors, and regulators. We seek to answer this question in a study, Paying for Long-Term Performance, which is available here. In our 2004 book Pay without Performance, we warned that standard executive pay […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Executive Compensation, HLS Research | Comments Off on Paying for Long-Term Performance