New OECD Corporate Governance Reports and the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance

Serdar Celik is Acting Head and Daniel Blume is a Senior Policy Analyst in the Corporate Governance and Corporate Finance Division of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). This post is based on two OECD reports issued on June 30, 2021, by the OECD Corporate Governance Committee, chaired by Mr. Masato Kanda of Japan. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Learning and the Disappearing Association between Governance and Returns by Lucian Bebchuk, Alma Cohen, and Charles C. Y. Wang (discussed on the Forum here); and What Matters in Corporate Governance? by Lucian Bebchuk, Alma Cohen, and Allen Ferrell.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has just issued two major new reports—The Future of Corporate Governance in Capital Markets Following the COVID-19 Crisis, and the 2021 edition of the OECD Corporate Governance Factbookthat will serve as key references for the OECD’s upcoming review and revisions to the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.

The G20/OECD Principles, since their first issuance by the OECD in 1999 and subsequent revisions in 2005 and 2015, are now recognized as the leading global standard to guide policy makers and regulators in devising effective institutional, legal and regulatory frameworks for the corporate governance of listed companies. Endorsed not only by the 38 members of the OECD but also by the G20 and Financial Stability Board, more than 50 jurisdictions worldwide now adhere to this OECD recommendation.

However, as the new OECD report on The Future of Corporate Governance in Capital Markets Following the COVID-19 Crisis makes clear, both the COVID-19 pandemic and longer-term trends suggest that governments’ corporate governance frameworks will need to make further adaptations to ensure that capital markets may serve their intended purpose of allocating substantial financial resources to support long-term investments underpinning economic growth and innovation.

The report finds that the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated existing structural weaknesses in the corporate sector and capital markets. Without a robust policy response, the number of undercapitalised and underperforming firms will likely rise and remain high, while an increasing amount of productive resources will be tied up in non-viable companies, dragging down investment and economic growth. In this context, substantial financial resources will be needed for investment, and strengthening corporate governance policies and frameworks will help both existing and new companies access the capital they need.

While the stock market provided record amounts of capital money to established companies, they failed to support new companies. Since 2005, more than 30,000 companies have delisted from stock markets globally, equivalent to 75% of all listed companies today. These delistings have not been matched by new listings, leading to a sharp net loss of publicly listed companies. As a result, many thousand fewer companies are using public equity markets and a large portion of the money raised in 2020 went to fewer and larger companies.

The bond market continued to be a significant source of capital for non-financial companies following the outbreak of the crisis. In 2020, non-financial companies issued a historical record of USD 2.9 trillion of corporate bond debt. As a result, the volume of outstanding corporate bond debt reached an all-time high in real terms of almost USD 15 trillion at the end of 2020.

However, the declining quality of the outstanding stock is concerning. Between 2018 and 2020, the portion of BBB rated bonds—the lowest investment grade rating—accounted for 52% of all investment grade issuance. Between 2000 and 2007, that share was just 39%. Globally, debt has also accumulated mainly in firms with lower debt servicing capacity.

The report concludes that strong corporate governance frameworks will be essential for capital markets to function effectively in supporting a resilient recovery and longer-term growth. With the COVID-19 crisis preventing many companies from meeting some legal and regulatory requirements, governments around the world have taken steps to adjust these requirements. Although some of these measures are considered temporary, they may also have a lasting impact on how companies are governed, their capital structure, their ownership structure and how they manage their relationship with their shareholders and stakeholders. This gives new impetus to the discussions on a number of long-term developments that may call for an adaptation of corporate governance policies and regulations in the post-COVID era.

To tackle these challenges, the report highlights four priorities for policy makers:

  • Adapt the corporate governance framework to address some of the weaknesses revealed by the pandemic. Experiences from the pandemic call for improvements in the frameworks for risk and crisis management as well as related issues such as audit quality, stock price manipulation and insider trading. Countries should also benefit from their experiences in order to advance or clarify the regulatory frameworks for remote participation in shareholder meetings. Recent practices by some companies related to altering the terms for executive remuneration following the crisis also call for renewed scrutiny of the conditions and procedures for deciding and overseeing performance-related pay.

Importantly, there has been an increase in ownership concentration at the company level in global stock markets. Institutional investors have considerably increased their assets under management over the last 15 years while the number of listed companies in many advanced equity markets has decreased. These opposing trends have resulted in a growing amount of money being allocated to a diminishing number of companies and the resulting re-concentration of ownership in the hands of large institutional investors. For example, the three largest institutional investors in the United States now hold a combined average of 23.5% of the equity in listed companies.

The concentration of ownership in some other markets reflects the importance of company group structures. For example, private corporations and holding companies in several Asian economies hold more than 30% of the total equity capital in publicly listed companies. The increase in ownership concentration can also be attributed to the presence of public sector ownership. Globally, the public sector, including central governments and sovereign wealth funds, owns USD 10.7 trillion of listed equity, which amounts to 10% of global market capitalisation.

  • Improve the management of environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk. Investor attention to ESG risk and its disclosure has been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Policy-makers and regulators need to ensure that investors have access to consistent, comparable, and reliable material information when managing their savings and assets. This would also help the corporate sector to meet increased expectations when it comes to recognising and appropriately balancing the interests of all stakeholders and their contribution to the long-term success of corporations.
  • Facilitate access to equity markets for sound businesses. A number of structural weaknesses in the stock market eco-system currently impair such access. First, the shift from retail direct investments to large institutional investors has created a bias towards large listed companies as the average share of institutional ownership in large listed companies is significantly higher than their ownership in smaller companies. Second, the structure of investment banking activity is an important factor behind high listing costs where high underwriting fees and stock price discounts have discouraged companies from going public. The systematic acquisition of smaller growth companies—especially by large technology companies—may be contributing to the drying up the IPO pipeline of smaller independent companies that could potentially increase competition and challenge the status quo. Addressing such weaknesses will help strengthen the balance sheets of viable corporations and the emergence of new business models that are essential for a sustainable recovery and long-term resilience.
  • Ensure insolvency frameworks support recovery and resilience. Crisis response policies have been holding back bankruptcies which otherwise would have happened, and these will re-emerge as business support is wound down. Keeping in mind the accumulation of low-quality debt in our economies, fit-for-purpose insolvency regimes that are coherent across jurisdictions will be essential.

The OECD Corporate Governance Factbook will serve as a second, important foundation for the review, highlighting the different ways in which the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance are implemented across all OECD, G20 and FSB member jurisdictions. It also provides policy makers and regulators who may be considering changes to their regulatory frameworks with an easily accessible and up-to-date, factual underpinning to compare their own frameworks with those of other countries, or to obtain information about policies and practices in specific jurisdictions. Featuring 63 figures and 42 tables comparing 50 jurisdictions, the Factbook summarizes leading tendencies and trends divided into four main chapters: 1) the global market and corporate ownership landscape; 2) the corporate governance and institutional framework; 3) the rights of shareholders and key ownership functions; and 4) the corporate board of directors.

Updated every two years, this edition provides substantially new material. The first chapter covering global trends in stock markets and the corporate ownership landscape essentially summarizes some of the most relevant findings from the OECD’s companion report on The Future of Corporate Governance in Capital Markets to provide context for the coverage of legal and regulatory provisions that follow. In addition to updating provisions enacted across all issue areas through to end-2020, this edition also contains new coverage on requirements for proxy advisors; a first comparison of provisions underpinning auditor independence, accountability and oversight; and new data to reflect trends in the gender composition of boards and senior management.

The Chapter 2 review of overall corporate governance and institutional frameworks shows that jurisdictions have been quite active in reviewing and amending their frameworks since the last time the G20/OECD Principles were reviewed and updated in 2015, with 90% of the jurisdictions having amended either their company law or securities law, or both. Nearly all jurisdictions have established comply or explain corporate governance codes, while a growing percentage of jurisdictions (62%) now issue national reports on how companies are implementing and reporting on such codes.

In addition to covering requirements related to the notice, disclosure and voting for shareholder meetings, Chapter 3 provides detailed coverage of frameworks for the review and disclosure of related party transactions, takeover provisions, and requirements for institutional investors to address and disclose how they deal with conflicts of interest, as well as various measures related to investor engagement and voting. A new review of similar provisions related to proxy advisors shows that while such regulations are increasing, they remain far less common than they are for institutional investors.

The final and most detailed chapter of the Factbook provides comprehensive information on structures and requirements related to boards of directors. It finds that risk management has been one of the most dynamic fields for market regulation in recent years, with provisions for companies to assign a risk management role to board level committees growing from 62% of jurisdictions in 2015 to 90% by the end of 2020. Provisions for internal control and risk management systems have grown even more sharply since 2015, from 62% to 96%. Another area where there has been a substantial increase in regulation is with respect to requirements or recommendations for disclosure of board and executive remuneration at least at aggregate level, with 88% of jurisdictions also requiring or recommending such disclosure for individual remuneration.

A new section of the chapter on the oversight of audit finds that all jurisdictions require an external auditor to be appointed to perform an audit of the financial statements of listed companies, while 98% of jurisdictions require or recommend the audit committee to play a role in the selection and appointment or removal process of the auditor. Nearly all jurisdictions also require the rotation of the audit firm or individual auditors after a given period.

A final section of the Factbook reviews trends with respect to the gender composition of boards and senior management. Three-fifths of jurisdictions have established requirements to disclose gender composition of boards, up from 49% as of the end of 2018, while such disclosure with respect to management is far less common, in only 28% of jurisdictions. About one-fourth of jurisdictions have adopted mandatory quotas for listed companies requiring a certain percentage of board seats to be filled by women, while a slightly higher and growing share (30%) have established more flexible mechanisms such as voluntary goals or targets, and 8% have introduced a combination of both.

Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>