Monthly Archives: April 2024

Creditor rights, collateral reuse, and credit supply

Brittany Lewis is an Assistant Professor of Finance at Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis. This post is based on her recent article forthcoming in the Journal of Financial Economics.

According to Griffin, Kruger, and Maturana (JFE, 2021), “ten years after the financial crisis, the central question of what explains the rise and fall in house prices remains unresolved.” In “Creditor Rights, Collateral Reuse, and Credit Supply” (JFE, 2024), I seek to address this central question by critically analyzing the contribution of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) 2005 in the build up to and unfolding of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008.

In addressing this question, the paper combines micro hand-collected data, an innovative research design, and a quasi-random experiment. The research design causally links BAPCPA to an expansion of credit supply that directly funded the mortgages most exposed to default in the GFC.  BAPCPA expanded the sale and repurchase, or “repo,” market’s “safe harbors” in the Bankruptcy Code to include mortgages loans, mortgage related securities and interest on mortgage loans and mortgage related securities. This change granted mortgage collateral preferred bankruptcy treatment and only affected private-label or risky mortgage collateral, since agency mortgage collateral had been granted this status in 1984.

READ MORE »

Weekly Roundup: April 5-11, 2024


More from:

This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of April 5-11, 2024

Proposed Amendments to DGCL on Stockholder Contracting Would Create More Problems Than They Purportedly Solve


A Deeper Dive into the SEC’s Landmark Climate Disclosure Rules for Public Companies


Practice Points in Response to Activision



2024 Annual Meeting Filing and Disclosure Requirements


Not at Any Price – Contested M&A, The New Normal


The Neoclassical View of Corporate Fiduciary Duty Law


Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions


SEC Fines Two Investment Advisers for “AI Washing”



HLS Forum on Corporate Governance Continues Growing


The New Framework provided by Moelis


The Global South in Comparative Corporate Governance



The Shareholder Activism of Anti-Discrimination Proponents


Low Carbon Mutual Funds


AI Governance Appears on Corporate Radar


AI Governance Appears on Corporate Radar

Subodh Mishra is Global Head of Communications at ISS STOXX. This post is based on an ISS-Corporate memorandum by Veronica Nikitas.

Key Takeaways

  • Only about 15% of companies in the S&P 500 provide some disclosure in proxy statements about board oversight of AI.
  • Disclosure of board oversight of AI and directors’ AI expertise is primarily found in the information technology sector, with 38% of companies providing some level of board oversight disclosure.
  • 13% of S&P 500 companies have at least one director with AI-related expertise.
  • As AI becomes a material factor for many companies, investors may start to demand that companies not only disclose relevant board skills and oversight responsibilities but also enhance disclosure on AI.

READ MORE »

Low Carbon Mutual Funds

Marco Ceccarelli is an Assistant Professor at Vrije Universiteit, Stefano Ramelli is an Assistant Professor at the University of St. Gallen, and Alexander F. Wagner is a Professor of Finance at the University of Zurich. This post is based on their article forthcoming in the Review of Finance.

How should investors behave in the face of climate–related risks and the energy transition to a low carbon world? To answer this question, it is important to recognize that accounting for climate risks in investment decisions brings investors both benefits and costs.

On the one hand, shunning carbon–intensive, “brown” assets can reduce an investor’s exposure to climate risks. These risks have arguably yet to fully materialize, both in terms of physical consequences and societal reactions. On the other hand, in our not–yet–low carbon economy, excluding “brown” assets and investing only in those considered “green” requires investors to forego opportunities to diversify. This trade–off is particularly salient in asset management, where portfolio diversification, not only the features of individual securities, plays a crucial role in reducing overall investment risk.

READ MORE »

The Shareholder Activism of Anti-Discrimination Proponents

Scott Shepard is General Counsel and Director, Stefan Padfield is Deputy Director, and Ethan Peck is an Associate of the Free Enterprise Project (FEP) at The National Center of Public Policy Research (NCPPR). This post was prepared for the Forum by Mr. Shepard, Mr. Padfield, and Mr. Peck.

FEP and Its Goals

The authors of this piece represent the Free Enterprise Project of the National Center for Public Policy Research (FEP), which has for nearly 20 years represented the interests of the center/right majority of Americans against ESG efforts that became more coordinated, better funded and more aggressively left-partisan in each of those years. ESG advocates have long pretended that they are not partisan but rather are “doing well by doing good” – making money for everyone doing lovely things with which no rational person might disagree. That was never a very convincing conceit, but became more demonstrably absurd each year.

READ MORE »

A brief review of the 2023 US proxy season and what to expect in 2024

Andrew R. Droste is Head of Corporate Governance for North America at Columbia Threadneedle Investments. This post is based on his Columbia Threadneedle memorandum.

At a glance

  • We briefly review key takeaways from the US proxy season in 2023, which included a record number of shareholder proposals going to a vote and a rise in anti-ESG shareholder proposals.
  • Looking into 2024 we expect the Universal Proxy Card rule to increasingly influence boards around board quality and shareholder rights.
  • We expect anti-ESG efforts to grab plenty of headlines. Investors meanwhile look set to continue to focus on material ESG issues and strategies.
  • Artificial intelligence is likely to remain a key theme as investors look to focus on its impact on boardrooms and business performance.

US proxy season 2023 review

  • Director election support remained largely consistent year over year (YoY), while independent chair shareholder proposals rose substantially.
  • The Universal Proxy Card (UPC) rule has significantly influenced proxy contests.
  • Say-on-pay (SOP) failures were down, although average support was consistent YoY.
  • A record number of shareholder proposals went to a vote; however, average support dropped substantially across environmental and social (E&S) proposals.
  • Anti-ESG shareholder proposals were on the rise, though shareholder support dips even lower.

READ MORE »

The Global South in Comparative Corporate Governance

Mariana Pargendler is Full Professor of Law at Fundação Getulio Vargas Law School in São Paulo. She will join Harvard Law School as Professor of Law in July 2024. This post is based on her SSRN working paper.

How does the Global South relate to the global debates on corporate governance? Studies in this area, like their counterparts in other areas of law, have traditionally focused on a handful of usual suspects from the Global North, thereby neglecting most of the world. The Global South, here understood as a synonym for developing countries, has been repeatedly overlooked. Since the late twentieth century, interest in the “emerging markets”—including those of Brazil, China, and India—has soared in view of their growing economic clout. Nevertheless, the corporate law and governance arrangements of these and other developing jurisdictions have often been examined based on the particular lenses and metrics conceived by the Global North.

In a chapter for the forthcoming Oxford Handbook on Corporate Law and Governance (Jeffrey N. Gordon & Wolf-Georg Ringe eds.), I explore both traditional and novel views on corporate governance in the Global South. The traditional view is that corporate laws in the Global South are antiquated, failed transplants of Global North institutions, or plagued by enforcement problems. Weaknesses in related institutions, such as poor contract enforcement and capital market failures, push for adaptations in ownership structures and governance arrangements. The result is that family ownership, business groups, and state ownership are particularly prevalent in the Global South. This view retains much descriptive and explanatory power, but it offers an incomplete portrayal of corporate law and governance in the Global South.

READ MORE »

The New Framework provided by Moelis

Nathan Barnett and Ben Strauss are Partners and Marina Leary is an Associate at McDermott Will & Emery. This post is based on their McDermott memorandum and is part of the Delaware law series; links to other posts in the series are available here.

In holding that certain provisions within the stockholder agreement of a Delaware corporation are invalid under the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL), the Delaware Court of Chancery has created a framework for evaluating whether an agreement impermissibly restricts the authority and duty of directors to manage the business and affairs of the corporation in their best judgment. While the case, West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Co., C.A. No. 2023-0309-JTL (Del. Ch. February 23, 2024), may be appealed by the defendant, the opinion provides important guidance for corporate planners when crafting agreements pertaining to internal governance of a Delaware corporation.

READ MORE »

HLS Forum on Corporate Governance Continues Growing


More from:

The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance published a total of 647 posts during 2023, and its readership has continued to display steady growth, including:

  • Attracting more than 200,000 unique readers a month;
  • Having visitors to the Forum coming from 233 countries and territories during the year; and
  • Attracting more than 4.1 million page views.

Established in 2006 by Professor Lucian Bebchuk and the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, the Forum has become the leading online resource and the central outlet for the exchange of ideas and debate in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.

READ MORE »

CEO Compensation and Cash-Flow Shocks: Evidence from Changes in Environmental Regulations

Ross Levine is a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. This post is based on a NBER working paper by Seungho Choi, Professor Levine, Raphael Jonghyeon Park, and Simon Xu.

Foundational theories of the firm suggest that (1) shocks to expected cash flows influence shareholder preferences toward corporate risk-taking, and (2) shareholders may respond by altering the risk-taking incentives contained in the compensation packages they give to their executives. For example, shocks that lower expected cash flows might lead shareholders to prefer that their firms undertake less risky corporate investments to mitigate bankruptcy risk, leading these shareholders to reduce the risk-taking incentives in their executives’ compensation packages. However, shareholders of sufficiently financially distressed firms might react oppositely. When firms close to bankruptcy receive adverse shocks, shareholders might alter compensation pay to induce their executives to shift toward higher-risk strategies to generate the returns necessary to avert bankruptcy. Furthermore, the relationship between cash-flow shocks and executive compensation is further complicated by the effectiveness of the firm’s corporate governance structure: the effect of shareholder risk preferences on executive compensation depends on shareholders’ ability to shape corporate decisions. Thus, the impact of expected cash flows on executive compensation is an empirical question that may depend on firms’ financial conditions and governance structures.

READ MORE »

Page 5 of 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8