-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- William Ackman
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- John Finley
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper
- Paul Hilal
- Carl Icahn William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
- Daniel Wolf
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Supreme Court Enforces Strict Pleading Standard for Private Securities Actions
Warren Stern, John Savarese, George Conway, and Garrett Moritz of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz have released this Memorandum assessing the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. In Tellabs, the Memo explains, “[s]ecurities class action defendants . . . won an important battle in the fight against meritless […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Class actions, Makor v. Tellabs, Securities litigation, Supreme Court
Comments Off on Supreme Court Enforces Strict Pleading Standard for Private Securities Actions
The Aardvark in the Boardroom
Editor’s Note: This post is from Joseph Hinsey of Harvard Business School. Okay–that was a shameless play on the classic elephant metaphor. But perhaps it’s a worthwhile way to remind us (once again?) of a fundamental issue long embedded in the corporate governance dialogue about shareholder rights and “shareholder democracy.” That issue is called to […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Op-Eds & Opinions
Tagged Boards of Directors, Shareholder power, Shareholder proposals
Comments Off on The Aardvark in the Boardroom
Disney’s Board Adopts a Bylaw Amendment Based on My Proposal
Editor’s Note: This post is from Lucian Bebchuk of Harvard Law School. The Board of Directors of the Walt Disney Company has adopted a bylaw amendment based on a revision of a proposal that I submitted last fall and which won 57% of the votes cast at Disney’s last annual meeting. Although my proposal fell […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Program News & Events
Tagged Charter & bylaws, Disney, Shareholder proposals
Comments Off on Disney’s Board Adopts a Bylaw Amendment Based on My Proposal
A Delaware Deal Law Two-Fer: Topps and Lear
Two opinions within 24 hours is enough to exhaust anyone. Two important decisions on the interaction of Delaware deal law and private equity deals requires the stamina only high caffeination can sustain. But here we have it: a true two-fer. This Memorandum describes the implications of these cases in detail.
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Delaware cases, Delaware law, In re Lear, In re Topps, Private equity
Comments Off on A Delaware Deal Law Two-Fer: Topps and Lear
Vice Chancellor Strine in the Journal of Corporation Law
Editor’s Note: This post is from Hillary Sale of the University of Iowa College of Law. This post is part of the Delaware law series, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available here. The University of Iowa College of Law’s Journal of Corporation […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Op-Eds & Opinions, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Delaware articles, Delaware law, General governance
Comments Off on Vice Chancellor Strine in the Journal of Corporation Law
CEOs Under Academic Fire
The National Journal has just published a long piece, CEOs Under Fire, by John Maggs, which reviews in detail the academic work on executive compensation by Lucian Bebchuk, Erik Lie, and Xavier Gabaix. The piece runs as follows: On March 13, after meeting with President Bush, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales faced the cameras and gave […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, HLS Research, Op-Eds & Opinions
Tagged Executive Compensation
1 Comment
Topps and Lear: Another View of the Cathedral
Latham & Watkins has recently issued this Client Alert on Vice Chancellor Strine‘s recent decisions in Topps and Lear. These two new opinions, also covered here and here, offer critical guidance to directors going through the acquisition process, and particularly boards contemplating going-private transactions. The Alert offers clients a number of considerations to guide deal […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Delaware cases, Delaware law, In re Lear, In re Topps
Comments Off on Topps and Lear: Another View of the Cathedral
Topps and Bottoms: A Dubious Performance By Dissident Directors
Vice Chancellor Leo Strine last week produced another wonderfully detailed and thoughtful opinion, this time in In re The Topps Company Shareholders Litigation, the case challenging the proposed sale of Topps (think baseball cards) to a private equity firm run by Michael Eisner (think Disney). There are already a number of descriptions and comments on […]
Click here to read the complete postYou Say Ph.D., I Say Toast
For those interested in the vigorous debate among academics and practitioners on the virtues and vices of shareholder activism, Part V of Storming the Castle, Lawdragon‘s recent profile on the discussion panels held last year here at Harvard as part of Professor Robert Clark‘s and Vice Chancellor Leo Strine‘s course Mergers, Acquisitions, and Split-Ups, is […]
Click here to read the complete postCreditors Cannot Bring Direct Claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty–But Substantial Questions Remain
In North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Gheewalla, the Delaware Supreme Court, in a case of first impression, provided some clarity on the controversial issue of whether and to what extent creditors have the ability to assert fiduciary duty claims against directors. The Supreme Court held, unequivocally, that “creditors of a Delaware corporation […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Bankruptcy, Debtor-creditor law, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, Fiduciary duties, Gheewalla
Comments Off on Creditors Cannot Bring Direct Claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty–But Substantial Questions Remain