-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Directors’ Oversight Role Today: Increased Expectations, Responsibility and Accountability—A Macro View
I. The Current State of Play The subjects falling within the purview of U.S. public company board of director oversight have grown to encompass virtually any subject that an investor, stakeholder or other party raises as being potentially material to a company and, therefore, needing board attention. Many issues—often under the umbrella of “environmental, social […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accountability, Board oversight, Boards of Directors, ESG, Institutional Investors, Oversight, Transparency
Comments Off on Directors’ Oversight Role Today: Increased Expectations, Responsibility and Accountability—A Macro View
Nevada Supreme Court Holds Statutory Business Judgment Rule Applies to All Claims Against Corporate Officers and Directors
Summary In a March 25, 2021 decision in Guzman v. Johnson, the Supreme Court of Nevada affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of class action claims concerning AMC Networks, Inc.’s (“AMC”) acquisition of its subsidiary, RLJ Entertainment Inc. (“RLJE”). Plaintiff claimed that, since AMC was RLJE’s controlling stockholder and RLJE directors were interested parties, Plaintiff had […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Director liability, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Nevada, Securities litigation, State law
Comments Off on Nevada Supreme Court Holds Statutory Business Judgment Rule Applies to All Claims Against Corporate Officers and Directors
How Should Performance Signals Affect Contracts?
Incentive pay for top executives is increasingly based on performance measures (“signals”) other than the stock price—financial metrics such as earnings and sales, and sustainability metrics such as carbon emissions and safety. How should performance signals be incorporated into incentive pay contracts? A simple solution is to give CEOs shares in the firm, because this […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, ESG, Executive Compensation
Tagged Equity-based compensation, ESG, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Management, Pay for performance, Performance measures, Signaling, Sustainability
Comments Off on How Should Performance Signals Affect Contracts?
As Strategic Financial Institutions Mergers Thrive, Lessons from the Boston Private Merger Proxy Contest
The past several months have seen a significant surge in strategic bank mergers. Having shored up their balance sheets through well-timed capital raises, conservative capital management and reserves taken during the depths of the Covid-19 pandemic, many banks and financial institutions have emerged in a position of strength, and are once again looking to strategic […]
Click here to read the complete postWeekly Roundup: April 30–May 6, 2021
Lazard’s Q1 2021 Review of Shareholder Activism Posted by Jim Rossman, Mary Ann Deignan, and Christopher Couvelier, Lazard, on Friday, April 30, 2021 Tags: Boards of Directors, ESG, Institutional Investors, International governance, Mergers & acquisitions, Proxy contests, Shareholder activism, SPACs Corporate Governance Update: “Materiality” in America and Abroad Posted by David A. Katz and Laura A. McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, May […]
Click here to read the complete postBusiness and Politics: When Should Companies Take a Public Position?
Those of us who lived through the 1960s hear a loud echo of those turbulent times in the challenges of the current decade. The ‘60s were a time of war and protests, assassinations, racial discrimination, and the fight for civil rights and against environmental pollution. The decade began and ended with recessions. Many of our […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, ESG, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, ESG, Management, Political spending, Public perception, Reputation
Comments Off on Business and Politics: When Should Companies Take a Public Position?
The SEC’s Latest Risk Alert Puts ESG Investing in the Crosshairs
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC, or Commission) Division of Examinations (Division) recently issued a Risk Alert highlighting staff observations from examinations of investment advisers, registered investment companies and private funds (firms) engaged in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing. This post summarizes the Risk Alert, including focus areas and observations of deficiencies and internal […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, ESG, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Disclosure, Environmental disclosure, ESG, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation
Comments Off on The SEC’s Latest Risk Alert Puts ESG Investing in the Crosshairs