-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Director Removal Without Cause
In a recent bench ruling on a summary judgment motion in a case involving Vaalco Energy, Vice Chancellor Laster held that a provision of a company’s charter or bylaws could not override the default rule under Delaware law that directors serving on a non-classified board (i.e., annually elected) may be removed with or without cause […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board declassification, Charter & bylaws, Classified boards, Delaware cases, Delaware law, DGCL, DGCL s.141, Majority voting, Mergers & acquisitions, Ousting directors, Shareholder activism, Shareholder elections, Shareholder voting
1 Comment
Weekly Roundup: January 1–January 8
CFTC’s Proposed Rules on Cybersecurity Posted by Dan Ryan, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, on Saturday, January 2, 2016 Tags: Accounting, Audits, CFTC, Clearing houses, Cybersecurity, Derivatives, Financial institutions, Recovery & resolution plans, Risk, Risk assessment, Risk oversight, Securities Regulation, Swaps, Swaps entities Recovery Planning for Large National Banks Posted by C. Andrew Gerlach, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, […]
Click here to read the complete postActivist Hedge Funds, Golden Leashes, and Advance Notice Bylaws
The tactics used by activist hedge funds to target companies continue to command the attention of corporate executives and board members. This post discusses recent cases highlighting activist efforts to replace directors at target companies. It also examines the use of controversial special compensation arrangements sometimes referred to as “golden leashes,” the arguments for and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Advanced notice, Board performance, Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Compensation committees, Director compensation, Executive Compensation, Golden leashes, Hedge funds, Incentives, Management, Pay for performance, Proxy contests, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Wachtell Lipton
1 Comment
Governance Challenges When Gatekeepers are “Chilled”
An emerging governance challenge is the need to address the tension between the pursuit of legitimate corporate strategic goals, and the concerns of internal “gatekeepers” who perceive themselves at increasing personal legal risk for corporate wrongdoing. This challenge is a direct byproduct of new enforcement initiatives of the Department of Justice and the Securities and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accountability, Audit committee, Boards of Directors, Compliance & ethics, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Conflicts of interest, DOJ, Internal auditors, Liability standards, Misconduct, Risk, Risk management, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Governance Challenges When Gatekeepers are “Chilled”
Ten Topics for Directors in 2016
U.S. public companies face a host of challenges as they enter 2016. Here is our annual list of hot topics for the boardroom in the coming year: Oversee the development of long-term corporate strategy in an increasingly interdependent and volatile world economy Cultivate shareholder relations and assess company vulnerabilities as activist investors target more companies […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Audit committee, Board composition, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Cybersecurity, Executive Compensation, Mergers & acquisitions, Proxy access, Risk management, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Social networks
Comments Off on Ten Topics for Directors in 2016
ISS Proxy Access FAQs: Problematic Proxy Access Provisions
Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) has published revised FAQs for its U.S. Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, including two new FAQs directly related to proxy access. This post provides an update to our Alerts dated October 21, 2015 (available here) on Navigating Proxy Access and November 23, 2015 (available here, and discussed on the Forum here) on […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Director nominations, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, ISS, Precatory proposals, Proxy access, Proxy advisors, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder rights, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on ISS Proxy Access FAQs: Problematic Proxy Access Provisions
Where are the Best (Corporate) Law Professors Teaching?
Are the best law professors teaching at the best law schools in the United States? And how can the best law schools around the world be evaluated in terms of the scholarship their professors produce? On this website we talk a lot about corporate governance, but what about the governance of scholars of corporate governance? […]
Click here to read the complete postGlobal and Regional Trends in Corporate Governance in 2016
Over the past few years, institutional investors have held boards increasingly accountable for company performance and have demanded greater transparency and engagement with directors. The real question investors are asking is How can we be sure we have a high-performing board in place? Most of the governance reforms currently under discussion globally attempt to address […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accountability, Board composition, Board leadership, Board performance, Boards of Directors, Brazil, Diversity, Engagement, EU, Europe, India, Institutional Investors, International governance, Japan, Securities regulation
2 Comments