-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- William Ackman
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- John Finley
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper
- Paul Hilal
- Carl Icahn William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
- Daniel Wolf
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
“Is Short-Term Behavior Jeopardizing the Future Prosperity of Business?”
In a must-read report highlighting the pressures public companies face to meet quarterly guidance, maximize immediate profits and extract value today instead of investing for the future, the Conference Board examines what is driving short-term behavior and outlines what can be done to restore balance. The following specially selected highlights from the report and associated […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Long-Term value, Shareholder activism, Shareholder value, Short-termism
Comments Off on “Is Short-Term Behavior Jeopardizing the Future Prosperity of Business?”
The Delaware Courts and the Investment Banks
A doctrinal innovation in Delaware law that first appeared a year ago is threatening to mature into a full-on trend: through the tort of “aiding-and-abetting” fiduciary breach, the Delaware courts, accepting the invitation of the stockholder-plaintiffs’ bar, have begun to take on the task of regulating the M&A advisory function of investment banks. In October […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Boards of Directors, Conflicts of interest, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Director liability, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, Financial advisers, Investment banking, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions
Comments Off on The Delaware Courts and the Investment Banks
Fund Advisers and Fee Disclosure in SEC Enforcement Action
October 7, 2015, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission or SEC) entered into a settlement agreement with Blackstone Management Partners L.L.C., Blackstone Management Partners III L.L.C., and Blackstone Management Partners IV L.L.C. (collectively, Blackstone) regarding certain Blackstone fee and expense disclosure practices. Without admitting or denying the Commission’s findings, Blackstone consented to a […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Banking & Financial Institutions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Compliance & ethics, Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Financial institutions, Investment advisers, Investment Advisers Act, Misconduct, SEC, SEC enforcement, SEC investigations
Comments Off on Fund Advisers and Fee Disclosure in SEC Enforcement Action
Building a Dynamic Framework for Offering Reform
I am very pleased to be here to help kick off the 47th Annual Securities Regulation Institute. As some of you know, I am no stranger to this program, nor is the SEC staff. I have participated since my early days as U.S. Attorney, and its tremendous success is largely due to its tireless organizers. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Capital formation, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Crowdfunding, Disclosure, Information environment, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, Regulation A, Regulators, Rule 506, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Small firms
Comments Off on Building a Dynamic Framework for Offering Reform
ISS Preliminary 2016 Voting Policy Updates
Today [October 26, 2015], ISS announced it is considering changing its U.S. voting policies in three areas heading into the 2016 proxy season: (i) when a sitting CEO or a non-CEO director will be viewed as “overboarded “on account of service on multiple boards, (ii) unilateral board actions that reduce shareholder rights (with a focus […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Classified boards, Director nominations, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, International governance, ISS, Majority voting, Overboarding, Proxy advisors, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder rights, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on ISS Preliminary 2016 Voting Policy Updates
The SEC Proposed Clawback Rule
On July 1, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Proposed Rule 10D-1 relating to so-called “clawbacks” pursuant to Section 10D of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Section 10D of the Exchange Act was added by Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accountability, Accounting, Clawbacks, Compensation disclosure, Executive Compensation, Financial reporting, Incentives, Liability standards, Management, Restatements, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation
Comments Off on The SEC Proposed Clawback Rule
Deal Activism
In today’s robust M&A environment, parties to a potential merger or acquisition must anticipate and manage “deal activism.” Just as all companies and boards should prepare for shareholder activism generally, deal participants should plan for the possibility that, after a deal is announced, activists may seek a higher price, encourage a topping bid for all […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Appraisal rights, Arbitrage, Board communication, Boards of Directors, Engagement, Hedge funds, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder activism, Shareholder value
Comments Off on Deal Activism
Harvard Convenes the 2015 Executive Compensation & Corporate Governance Roundtable
The Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance and the Harvard Law School Program on Institutional Investors convened the Harvard Roundtable on Executive Compensation & Corporate Governance last Wednesday, October 21, 2015. The event brought together for a roundtable discussion 62 prominent experts with a wide range of perspectives on the subject, including senior officers from leading […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Program News & Events
Tagged Clawbacks, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Pay for performance, Program on Corporate Governance, Program on Institutional Investors
Comments Off on Harvard Convenes the 2015 Executive Compensation & Corporate Governance Roundtable
Are Institutions Informed About News?
Who is informed on the stock market? There are plenty of reasons to believe that institutional investors possess value-relevant information. Unlike retail investors, institutions often directly communicate with publicly traded firms as well as brokerage firms through their investment banking, lending, and asset management divisions. Most mutual funds and hedge funds employ buy-side analysts and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Banking & Financial Institutions, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors
Tagged Earnings announcements, Financial institutions, Information asymmetries, Information environment, Insider trading, Institutional Investors, Market efficiency, Market reaction, Stock analysts, Stock returns
Comments Off on Are Institutions Informed About News?