-
Supported By:

Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
ISS and Glass Lewis Update Proxy Voting Guidelines for 2015
Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis have both released updates to their respective proxy voting guidelines. [1] ISS’s revised policies will take effect for annual meetings occurring on or after February 1, 2015. Glass Lewis’s new policies will take effect for meetings occurring after January 1, 2015, while its clarifications of existing policies […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Glass Lewis, ISS, Proxy advisors, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on ISS and Glass Lewis Update Proxy Voting Guidelines for 2015
Global Banks at a Strategic Crossroad
In Q1 and early Q2 2014, SSgA actively engaged with 15 global banks ahead of the proxy voting season. These engagements were conducted jointly with members of SSgA’s investment and governance teams. Our engagement addressed specific governance issues at each bank and also encompassed a wider discussion on the changing regulatory landscape and its impact […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Banks, Engagement, Executive Compensation, Financial institutions, Institutional Investors, Institutional voting, Proxy voting, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Global Banks at a Strategic Crossroad
New York Appeals Court Applies Business Judgment Rule to Going Private Transaction
On November 20, 2014, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, in a case of first impression under New York law, ruled in favor of Kenneth Cole in a litigation where minority shareholders had challenged the fashion designer’s transaction to take private Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. Mr. Cole controlled approximately 89% of KCP’s voting power […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Business judgment rule, Fairness review, Fiduciary duties, Going private, Mergers & acquisitions, Minority shareholders, New York, U.S. federal courts
Comments Off on New York Appeals Court Applies Business Judgment Rule to Going Private Transaction
Advantages of Board Actions on a “Clear Day”
In its landmark 1971 Chris-Craft decision, the Delaware Supreme Court observed that “inequitable action does not become permissible simply because it is legally possible.” This quote aptly captures the two-stage inquiry that Delaware courts will apply when reviewing a challenged board action—first determining the legality of the action, and second appraising the equity, or fairness, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Advanced notice, Attorneys' fees, Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Forum selection, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits, Takeover defenses
Comments Off on Advantages of Board Actions on a “Clear Day”
Protecting the Technological Infrastructure of Our Capital Markets
Today [November 19, 2014], the Commission considers adopting Regulation Systems, Compliance, and Integrity (or Regulation SCI). These rules and amendments are intended to establish a foundational regulatory framework for the technological market infrastructure that has become increasingly intertwined with the functioning of our securities markets. The rules being considered for adoption today represent a clear […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Algorithmic trading, Capital markets, Cybersecurity, Investor protection, Risk management, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Protecting the Technological Infrastructure of Our Capital Markets
Lawyers as Professionals and Citizens: Key Roles and Responsibilities in the 21st Century
We have written a detailed essay presenting practical vision of the responsibilities of lawyers as both professionals and as citizens at the beginning of the 21st century. Specifically, we seek to define and give content to four ethical responsibilities that we believe are of signal importance to lawyers in their fundamental roles as expert technicians, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accountability, Compliance & ethics, Corporate culture, Social capital
Comments Off on Lawyers as Professionals and Citizens: Key Roles and Responsibilities in the 21st Century
The Next Wave of Proxy Access Proposals
The Comptroller of the City of New York, who oversees pension funds with a combined $160 billion in assets, recently submitted proxy access shareholder proposals at 75 U.S. public companies as part of its Boardroom Accountability Project. [1] These 75 companies, representing a wide range of industries and market capitalizations, were targeted based on three […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Director nominations, New York, Precatory proposals, Proxy access, Rule 14a-8, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on The Next Wave of Proxy Access Proposals
Revisiting Executive Pay in Family-Controlled Firms
In our paper, Revisiting Executive Pay in Family-Controlled Firms, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we reexamine executive pay in family-controlled firms and challenge the findings in the existing literature. According to the prior literature, family executives of family-controlled firms receive lower compensation than non-family executives. Using 82 family-controlled firms in the U.S. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation
Tagged Business groups, Closely-held corporations, Common ownership, Dividends, Executive Compensation, Korea, Management, Social capital
Comments Off on Revisiting Executive Pay in Family-Controlled Firms
Successful Motions to Dismiss Securities Class Actions in 2014
Motions to dismiss have been called “the main event” in securities class actions. They are filed in over 90% of securities class actions and they result in dismissal close to 50% of the time they are filed. In contrast, out of 4,226 class actions filed between 1995 and 2013, only 14 were resolved through a […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Class actions, Exchange Act, Section 10(b), Securities Act, Securities litigation
Comments Off on Successful Motions to Dismiss Securities Class Actions in 2014
Operational Risk Capital: Nowhere to Hide
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) last month proposed revisions to its operational risk capital framework. The proposal sets out a new standardized approach (SA) to replace both the basic indicator approach (BIA) and the standardized approach (TSA) for calculating operational risk capital. In our view, four key points are worth highlighting with respect […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Banks, Basel Committee, Capital requirements, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Foreign banks, International governance, Risk assessment
Comments Off on Operational Risk Capital: Nowhere to Hide