-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Financial Dependence and Innovation
While innovation is crucial for businesses to gain strategic advantage over competitors, financing innovation tends to be difficult because of uncertainty and information asymmetry associated with innovative activities (Hall and Lerner (2010)). Firms with innovative opportunities often lack capital. Stock markets can provide various benefits as a source of external capital by reducing asymmetric information, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Cash flows, External financing, Innovation, Patents, Private firms, Public firms, R&D
Comments Off on Financial Dependence and Innovation
Evaluating Pension Fund Investments Through The Lens Of Good Corporate Governance
I understand today’s participants include a number of trustees and asset managers for some of the country’s largest public and private pension funds. Without a doubt, pension funds play an important role in our capital markets and the global economy. This is due, in part, to the fast growth in pension fund assets, both in […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Board composition, Diversity, Engagement, Executive Compensation, Fiduciary duties, Financial reporting, Fund managers, Institutional Investors, Pension funds, SEC, Shareholder rights
Comments Off on Evaluating Pension Fund Investments Through The Lens Of Good Corporate Governance
Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy
While corporate charitable contributions are frequent and often substantial, there is no clear evidence in the literature on whether these expenditures have positive effects on firm revenues or performance or on shareholder wealth. In our paper, Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy, which was recently accepted at the Review of Financial Studies, we use contributions of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Corporate Social Responsibility, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation
Tagged Agency costs, Charitable spending, Corporate Social Responsibility, Executive Compensation, Philanthropy
Comments Off on Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy
Banking Agencies Release Limited Volcker Rule Guidance
On June 10, 2014, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (collectively, the “Banking Agencies”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) released substantially identical Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”) addressing six topics regarding the implementation of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Banks, CFTC, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, FDIC, Federal Reserve, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, OCC, Proprietary trading, SEC, Securities regulation, Volcker Rule
Comments Off on Banking Agencies Release Limited Volcker Rule Guidance
The Institutional Investor Stewardship Myth in a Dutch Context
The concept of institutional investor stewardship is based on the notion that in publicly listed companies responsibility for corporate governance is shared. The primary responsibility lies with the board, which oversees the actions of its management. Institutional investors in the company are assumed to play an important role in holding the board to account for […]
Click here to read the complete postDefining Dealers and Major Participants in the Cross-Border Context
Dealers and major participants play a crucial role in the derivatives market, a market that has been estimated to exceed $710 trillion worldwide, of which more than $14 trillion represents transactions in security-based swaps. In the United States, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the SEC share responsibility for regulating the derivatives market. Out […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Derivatives, Financial Crisis, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Cross-border transactions, Derivatives, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial crisis, International governance, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Swaps, Swaps entities, Systemic risk
Comments Off on Defining Dealers and Major Participants in the Cross-Border Context
An Economist’s View of Market Evidence in Valuation and Bankruptcy Litigation
Courts often face many challenges when assessing the solvency of a company whether public or privately held. Examples of difficult valuation questions include: would a company with a market capitalization of several hundred million dollars possibly be insolvent? Or, would publicly-traded debt at or near par be conclusive evidence that the issuer is solvent at […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Bankruptcy, Debt, Firm valuation, Liquidity, Market efficiency
Comments Off on An Economist’s View of Market Evidence in Valuation and Bankruptcy Litigation
A Few Things Directors Should Know About the SEC
The SEC today has about 4,200 employees, located in Washington and 11 regional offices across the country, including one in San Francisco that is very ably led by Regional Director Jina Choi, who is here [June 23, 2014]. Many of you have likely had some contact with our Division of Corporation Finance, which, among other […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Audit committee, Audits, Boards of Directors, Compliance & ethics, Corporate culture, Engagement, Financial reporting, Oversight, SEC, SEC enforcement, SEC investigations, Whistleblowers
Comments Off on A Few Things Directors Should Know About the SEC
Recent Developments in Whistleblower Protections
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”) and the Consumer Financial Protection Act (“CFPA”) impose overlapping anti-retaliation provisions that generally prohibit retaliation against corporate “whistleblowers.” Recent headlines of whistleblower awards granted to individuals, especially under Dodd-Frank, underscore the fact that, even if a company’s […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Compliance & ethics, Dodd-Frank Act, Misconduct, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, SOX, Whistleblowers
Comments Off on Recent Developments in Whistleblower Protections