Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

ISS Updates Proxy Voting Policies, Requests Peer Group Changes

On November 21, 2013, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) released updates to its proxy voting policies for the 2014 proxy season, effective for meetings held on or after February 1, 2014. [1] In addition, ISS has requested that companies notify it by December 9, 2013 of any changes to a company’s self-selected peer companies for […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Corporate Social Responsibility, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on ISS Updates Proxy Voting Policies, Requests Peer Group Changes

Corporate Governance at Silicon Valley Companies 2013

Since 2003, Fenwick has collected a unique body of information on the corporate governance practices of publicly traded companies that is useful for Silicon Valley companies and publicly-traded technology and life science companies across the U.S. as well as public companies and their advisors generally. Fenwick’s annual survey covers a variety of corporate governance practices […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Corporate Governance at Silicon Valley Companies 2013

Jobs Act Title III Crowdfunding Moves Closer To Reality

On October 23, 2013, the SEC voted unanimously to propose Regulation Crowdfunding, [1] the rules related to the offer and sale of securities through crowdfunded private offerings, as set forth in Title III of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (“JOBS”) Act. FINRA then published its proposed rules governing the licensing and regulation of so-called “funding […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Jobs Act Title III Crowdfunding Moves Closer To Reality

The Growth of Appraisal Litigation in Delaware

Numerous commentators and academics have written about the growth of M&A litigation over the last several years. Less noticed, but perhaps more significant, has been the growing tendency of institutional and other large investors to exercise their appraisal rights under Delaware law. Investors in several recent high-profile mergers have announced their intention to, or sought […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Growth of Appraisal Litigation in Delaware

The Effect of Audit Committee Expertise on Monitoring Financial Reporting

In our paper, The Effect of Audit Committee Industry Expertise on Monitoring the Financial Reporting Process, forthcoming in The Accounting Review, we examine the impact of audit committee (AC) industry expertise on the AC’s effectiveness in monitoring the financial reporting process. Despite the increased responsibilities, authority, independence, and financial expertise requirements placed on ACs by […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Effect of Audit Committee Expertise on Monitoring Financial Reporting

Supreme Court to Consider Overruling “Fraud-on-the-Market” Presumption

On November 15, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., No. 13-317, raising the prospect that the Court will overrule or significantly limit the legal presumption that each member of a securities fraud class action relied on the statements challenged as fraudulent in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Supreme Court to Consider Overruling “Fraud-on-the-Market” Presumption

International Corporate Governance Spillovers

In the paper, International Corporate Governance Spillovers: Evidence from Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we investigate whether the change in corporate control following a cross-border M&A leads to changes in corporate governance of non-target firms that operate in the same country and industry as the target firm. We focus […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on International Corporate Governance Spillovers

Shareholder Activism in the US Banking Industry

Although the 2012 and 2013 proxy seasons saw increased (and highly publicized) shareholder activism across a range of industries, that trend has not yet made its way to the U.S. banking industry. Over the last two proxy seasons, aside from Nelson Peltz’s well-publicized campaign for action at State Street Corporation, certain negative say-on-pay recommendations from […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Shareholder Activism in the US Banking Industry

The Impact of CEO Divorce on Shareholders

Recent events suggest that shareholders pay attention to matters involving the personal lives of CEOs and take this information into account when making investment decisions. In our paper, Separation Anxiety: The Impact of CEO Divorce on Shareholders, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we examine the impact that CEO divorce can have on […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The SEC Delays its Consideration of Rules Requiring Disclosure of Corporate Political Spending

Last week the Securities and Exchange Commission released its regulatory agenda, and this agenda no longer includes rules requiring public companies to disclose their spending on politics. The agenda now includes only overdue rules that the SEC is required to develop under Dodd-Frank and the JOBS Act. While we are disappointed by the SEC’s decision […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, HLS Research, Program News & Events, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment