Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

No Magic Bullet in Post-Credit Crisis Investment Litigation

Nearly a decade ago, the United States Supreme Court in Dura Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Broudo, 544 U.S. 336, 345 (2005), emphasized that a securities fraud suit is not an investor’s insurance policy against market losses. As courts continue to address the fallout from the financial crisis that began in 2007, the court’s admonition is alive […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Financial Crisis, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on No Magic Bullet in Post-Credit Crisis Investment Litigation

“SPOE” Resolution Strategy for SIFIs under Dodd-Frank

On December 10, 2013, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) proposed for public comment a notice (the “Notice”) describing its “Single Point of Entry” (“SPOE”) strategy for resolving systemically important financial institutions (“SIFIs”) in default or in danger of default under the orderly liquidation authority granted by Title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on “SPOE” Resolution Strategy for SIFIs under Dodd-Frank

Do Managers Manipulate Earnings Prior to Management Buyouts?

In the paper, Do Managers Manipulate Earnings Prior to Management Buyouts?, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we investigate accounting manipulation prior to buyout transactions in the UK during the second buyout wave of 1997 to 2007. Prior to management buyouts (MBOs), managers have an incentive to deflate the reported earnings numbers by […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Do Managers Manipulate Earnings Prior to Management Buyouts?

ISS Publishes Guidance on Director Compensation (and Other Qualification) Bylaws

In the latest instance of proxy advisors establishing a governance standard without offering evidence that it will improve corporate governance or corporate performance, ISS has adopted a new policy position that appears designed to chill board efforts to protect against “golden leash” incentive bonus schemes. These bonus schemes have been used by some activist hedge […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on ISS Publishes Guidance on Director Compensation (and Other Qualification) Bylaws

Carried Interests: Current Developments

The tax status of so-called “carried interests,” held by private equity fund sponsors (and benefitting, in particular, the individual managers of those sponsors) is the subject of this post. A decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit holding that a private equity fund was engaged in a trade or business for […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Carried Interests: Current Developments

Gender Quotas for Corporate Boards

Gender quotas for corporate boards of directors have attracted attention in Europe, where a number of countries have enacted mandatory or voluntary quotas. In the United States, some activists, scholars, and policy makers have advocated quotas as a way to shatter the glass ceiling for women in business and (possibly) to improve corporate decisionmaking. The […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Gender Quotas for Corporate Boards

Update on the Halliburton Fraud-on-the-Market Case

As we have described in our prior posts and memos (here and here), in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., No. 13-317, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to abandon the “fraud on the market” presumption of reliance that has facilitated class-action treatment of claims brought under Section 10(b) of the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Update on the Halliburton Fraud-on-the-Market Case

Regulation A+ Offerings—A New Era at the SEC

December 18, 2013 may well mark an historic turning point in the ability of small business to effectively access capital in the private and public markets under the federal securities regulatory framework. On that day the Commissioners of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission met in open session and unanimously authorized the issuance of proposed […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Managerial Risk Taking Incentives and Corporate Pension Policy

In our paper, Managerial Risk Taking Incentives and Corporate Pension Policy, forthcoming in the Journal of Financial Economics, we examine whether the compensation incentives of top management affect the extent of risk shifting versus risk management behavior in pension plans. The employee beneficiaries of a firm’s defined benefit pension plan hold claims on the firm similar to those […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Managerial Risk Taking Incentives and Corporate Pension Policy

Statement on the SEC’s Issuance of Certain Exemptive Orders Related to Rule 17g-5(c)(1)

Rule 17g-5(c)(1) (the “Rule”) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 addresses nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”) conflict of interest concerns by prohibiting an NRSRO from issuing a credit rating where the person soliciting the rating was the source of 10% or more of the total net revenue of the NRSRO during the most […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Statement on the SEC’s Issuance of Certain Exemptive Orders Related to Rule 17g-5(c)(1)