-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
A Test of Stakeholder Governance
In our paper, A Test of Stakeholder Capitalism, we argue that companies turn to stakeholders to obtain more information about how to deal with looming risks. Many corporate choices affect stakeholders, whose reaction, if assessed beforehand, can help the company in its decisionmaking. When management realizes that stakeholder feedback can help it prepare a more […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, ESG
Tagged Boards of Directors, Corporate purpose, ESG, Shareholder primacy, Stakeholders, Sustainability
Comments Off on A Test of Stakeholder Governance
Books and Records Demands
The right of stockholders to seek corporate books and records is a well-established feature of corporate law in Delaware, where most big American companies are incorporated. But the number of statutory records demands has spiked in recent years, and the scope of the requests has broadened, as Delaware courts have limited companies’ defenses and taken […]
Click here to read the complete postThe New Landscape of Human Capital Metrics
Intuitively, many companies understand the importance of strategically investing in their employees. Past academic research has found employees contribute materially to the long-term value creation of a corporation. For instance, the “100 Best Companies to Work in America” had significantly higher stock returns than industry averages. Higher firm investment in intangible assets is associated with […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Compensation ratios, Disclosure, ESG, Human capital, Institutional Investors, Regulation S-K, SEC, Securities regulation
Comments Off on The New Landscape of Human Capital Metrics
Taking Corwin Seriously
Friendly sales of control are a well-known breeding ground for corporate agency costs. Managers, for instance, might be tempted to push through a transaction with a favored bidder instead of exploring an overture organized by a party against whom they hold a grudge. Or they might offer the buyer a sweetheart deal with the anticipation […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Corwin, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Hedge funds, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting, Takeovers
Comments Off on Taking Corwin Seriously
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the Standards for Demand Futility
A pair of opinions released by the Delaware Supreme Court in a single week have revisited longstanding precedent governing shareholder suits that claim corporate wrongdoing. As discussed in a companion post on this blog, the first of those opinions, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. v. Rosson, restricted the ability of shareholders to bring direct claims under […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Demand futility, Dual-class stock, Facebook, Pension funds, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the Standards for Demand Futility
Climate Stewardship
Voting Record Our Voting Record on Climate Related Shareholder Proposals for 2ºC Scenario Proposals Our voting on climate change is typically prompted by shareholder proposals. However, we may also take voting action against directors even in the absence of shareholder proposals for unaddressed concerns pertaining to climate change. The number of climate-related proposals on company […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Elections & Voting, ESG, Institutional Investors
Tagged Asset management, Climate change, Engagement, ESG, Index funds, Institutional Investors, Stewardship, Sustainability
Comments Off on Climate Stewardship
Climate in the Boardroom 2021
In 2021 proxy voting by the largest asset managers remained wholly insufficient to the scale and urgency of the climate crisis, according to a new report by Majority Action. Following years of accountability efforts from clients, fellow shareholders, and climate advocates, substantial progress has been made in asset manager support for climate-related shareholder proposals. Despite this, benchmarking […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Asset management, Boards of Directors, Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Say on climate, Sustainability
Comments Off on Climate in the Boardroom 2021
Direct vs. Derivative Standing
Every once in a while, a court admits it made a mistake. And, in even rarer circumstances, that admission comes from a court as prominent as the Supreme Court of Delaware. But that’s exactly what happened last week in Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. v. Rosson, in which Delaware’s highest court overruled its own 2006 holding […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Capital structure, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Derivative suits, Dual-class stock, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, Standing
Comments Off on Direct vs. Derivative Standing
BlackRock to Permit Some Clients to Vote
According to the Financial Times, “[p]ension funds and retail investors have complained for years over their lack of ability to vote at annual meetings when using an asset manager.” Last week, BlackRock, the largest asset manager in the galaxy with $9.5 trillion under management, announced that, beginning in 2022, it will begin to “expand the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Asset management, BlackRock, Index funds, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on BlackRock to Permit Some Clients to Vote
Are Narcissistic CEOs All That Bad?
We recently published a paper on SSRN, Are Narcissistic CEOs All That Bad?, which examines the prevalence of narcissism among corporate CEOs and the impact that narcissism has on corporate stock-price performance and other outcomes. The role that a CEO’s personality plays in determining outcomes is a topic of considerable interest to researchers, the media, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, ESG, Executive Compensation
Tagged ESG, Executive Compensation, Management, Manager characteristics, Managerial style
Comments Off on Are Narcissistic CEOs All That Bad?