Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Supervisory and Company-Run Stress Test Requirements

Summary In October 2012, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) published in the Federal Register final rules implementing the requirements of Section 165(i)(1) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) concerning supervisory stress tests to be conducted by the FRB (the “Annual Supervisory Stress Test Rule”) […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Supervisory and Company-Run Stress Test Requirements

Business Roundtable and the Future of SEC Rulemaking

The Securities and Exchange Commission has suffered a number of recent setbacks in areas ranging from enforcement policy to rulemaking. One of the most serious was the DC Circuit’s 2011 decision in Business Roundtable v. SEC, in which the court invalidated the SEC’s proxy access rule, Rule 14a-11, on the basis that the SEC had […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Corporate Elections & Voting, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Business Roundtable and the Future of SEC Rulemaking

Let Shareholders Know How Their Money Is Spent

Editor’s Note: Lucian Bebchuk is Professor of Law, Economics, and Finance at Harvard Law School. Bebchuk served as co-chair of the Committee on Disclosure of Corporate Political Spending, which filed a rulemaking petition concerning political spending, discussed on the Forum here and here. Posts discussing his articles on corporate political spending, Corporate Political Speech: Who […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Program News & Events, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Let Shareholders Know How Their Money Is Spent

The Expanded Role of Economists in SEC Rulemaking

Editor’s Note: The following post comes to us from Craig M. Lewis, chief economist and director of the Division of Risk, Strategy, and Financial Innovation at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This post is based on Mr. Lewis’s remarks at the SIFMA Compliance & Legal Society Luncheon, available here. The views expressed in this […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Expanded Role of Economists in SEC Rulemaking

Building Relationships with Your Shareholders Through Effective Communication

Introduction In recent years, shareholders of US public companies have increasingly invited dialogue with management, sometimes even demanding personal interaction with directors. This trend is part of a new paradigm in the corporate governance realm. Historically, despite some management engagement with shareholders, companies have seen little in the way of direct dialogue between shareholders and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , | Comments Off on Building Relationships with Your Shareholders Through Effective Communication

Taxing Control

Early corporate law scholarship argued both that anti-takeover devices are inefficient (they reduce the value of the firm) and that firms adopt efficient governance terms before they make their initial public offering. Some of this scholarship asserted that firms go public without anti-takeover devices and adopt them later when agency costs are higher. However, subsequent […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Corporate Elections & Voting | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Taxing Control

The Economic Consequences of Proxy Advisor Say-on-Pay Voting Policies

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) imposed a requirement that public companies allow shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on executive compensation (typically annually). This requirement is commonly referred to as say-on-pay (SOP). Shareholders that disagree with a firm’s executive compensation program can cast anon-binding (or precatory) vote […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Economic Consequences of Proxy Advisor Say-on-Pay Voting Policies

Protecting Investors through Independent, High Quality Audits

Editor’s Note: The following post comes to us from Jeanette M. Franzel, board member of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. This post is based on Ms. Franzel’s remarks at the NACD 2012 Board Leadership Conference, available here. The views expressed in this post are those of Ms. Franzel and should not be attributed to […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Final Rules from the Federal Banking Agencies

On October 19, 2012, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Federal Reserve Board (“Board”) approved final rules, which were proposed for comment in January of this year, [1] implementing the Dodd-Frank Act’s company-run stress testing requirements for all insured depository institutions with total consolidated […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Regulation of the Investment Advisers

Editor’s Note: Daniel M. Gallagher is a Commissioner at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This post is based on a statement from Commissioner Gallagher; the full speech, including footnotes, is available here. The views expressed in the post are those of Commissioner Gallagher and do not necessarily reflect those of the Securities and Exchange […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Regulation of the Investment Advisers