Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Madoff – Could it Have Happened in the UK?

This post outlines what the alleged Madoff fraud involved and how it was able to happen. It looks at relevant aspects of the US regulatory system and draws attention to some similarities in the UK system. The Madoff debacle Bernard Madoff’s alleged Ponzi scheme is reported to have cost clients $50bn. His business was run […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Areas for Enhanced Board Focus

Recent events in the financial markets and the ensuing economic turmoil has shattered the trust of investors, regulators and Main Street in financial institutions and the capital markets on a global scale. The crisis has heightened focus on the importance of risk management at all corporations and has encouraged a fresh look at the role […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Areas for Enhanced Board Focus

Risk and The Chief Legal Officer: Expanding Exposure

My firm has prepared a memo entitled “Risk and The Chief Legal Officer: Expanding Exposure,” which addresses what we believe is expanding exposure facing Chief Legal Offices (CLOs) of US public companies. The first two sections briefly address the two key underpinnings of this phenomenon: (1) increasing focus on the CLO as a central player […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Risk and The Chief Legal Officer: Expanding Exposure

Executive Compensation: What Obama’s Plan Means

Editor’s Note: This article was recently published by the author, Ben Heineman, in Business Week. Mr. Heineman is General Electric’s former senior vice-president for law and public affairs, and is author of “High Performance with High Integrity”. The Administration’s attempt to deal with excessive pay is more about procedure than substance and will allow most […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Op-Eds & Opinions | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Executive Compensation: What Obama’s Plan Means

Back to Purchasing Troubled Assets

Editor’s Note: This post is by Lucian Bebchuk of Harvard Law School. The plan proposed by Treasury Secretary Paulson last September focused on the government’s purchasing “troubled assets” from banks and other financial institutions. Critics (including myself) stressed the huge difficulties that would be involved in the government’s placing a value on troubled assets and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Financial Crisis, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Op-Eds & Opinions | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Moral Hazard and Managerial Compensation

In our recently accepted American Economic Review paper entitled Has Moral Hazard Become a More Important Factor in Managerial Compensation? we estimate a model of moral hazard with data spanning a sixty-year period in order to investigate how well two specific channels explain secular changes in managerial compensation and to assess their relative importance. First, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Moral Hazard and Managerial Compensation

More on the Administration’s Compensation Guidelines

Related to the recent op-ed piece from Professor Bebchuk regarding the new Treasury executive guidelines, here are key fixes to those new guidelines recommended by Jesse Brill, Chair of CompensationStandards.com: One key aspect of the Obama Adminstration’s new $500,000 cap that has not gotten sufficient attention is the unlimited amount of restricted stock and stock […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Reactions to Bebchuk on the Administration’s Compensation Guidelines

In response to Lucian Bebchuk’s post from yesterday, Bernard Sharfman writes: I also agree that the proposed salary caps are mainly symbolic. In 2008, Wall Street paid out $18.4 billion in bonuses to its approximately 164K plus employees. Based on this data and the limited number of firms and number of employees (5 per firm) […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged | Comments Off on Reactions to Bebchuk on the Administration’s Compensation Guidelines

The Administration’s Executive Pay Guidelines

Editor’s Note: This post is based on an op-ed piece by Lucian Bebchuk in today’s Wall Street Journal. Critics of the administration’s proposed guidelines on executive compensation say they are a dangerous intrusion into corporate boards’ authority and would make it difficult for financial firms to fill executive positions. These criticisms are unwarranted. If anything, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Op-Eds & Opinions | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

SEC vs. Mark Cuban

I have recently filed an amicus brief on behalf of myself and Professor Bainbridge of the UCLA Law School, Professor Jonathan Macey of Yale Law School, Professor Alan Bromberg of SMU Law School and Professor Henderson of the University of Chicago Law School in the litigation filed against Mark Cuban by the SEC in the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, HLS Research, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , | 3 Comments