-
Supported By:


Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Best Practices for Disclosing Executive Health Issues
The death of Oracle CEO Mark Hurd in October has highlighted a longstanding public company dilemma: whether and when to disclose the news that a senior leader has a serious health challenge. Not only is the topic sensitive from a personal and privacy perspective, but there is no specific rule or duty that requires disclosure […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Disclosure, Duty to inform, Executive performance, Information environment, Materiality, Privacy, Securities regulation, Shareholder rights, Transparency
Comments Off on Best Practices for Disclosing Executive Health Issues
The Value Killers
In a business climate marked by escalating global competition and industry disruption, successful mergers and acquisitions are increasingly vital to the growth and profitability of many companies. Yet research shows most mergers fail—destroying shareholder value and costing companies billions in dollars. Over the decades, multiple studies have shown that most mergers and acquisitions fail to […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions
Tagged Long-Term value, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder value, Strategic buyers, Transparency
Comments Off on The Value Killers
A Five-Year Review of Discretionary Compensation
With over US$20 billion paid out in total over the past five years, discretionary compensation has become a systemic compensation issue that needs to be addressed. Since 2014, at least US$3.7 billion has been paid in discretionary compensation to executives in any given year. Not only are the amounts substantial, around 80% of all awards […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Management, Pay for performance, Pension funds
Comments Off on A Five-Year Review of Discretionary Compensation
Corporate Governance for Sustainability Statement
Introduction The current model of corporate governance needs reform. There is mounting evidence that the practices of shareholder primacy drive company directors and executives to adopt the same short time horizon as financial markets. Pressure to meet the demands of the financial markets drives stock buybacks, excessive dividends and a failure to invest in productive […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, ESG, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accountability, Boards of Directors, Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Fiduciary duties, Short-termism, Stakeholders, Sustainability
Comments Off on Corporate Governance for Sustainability Statement
Proxy Voting Analytics (2016-2019) and 2020 Season Preview
Proxy Voting Analytics reviews proxy voting data of business corporations registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that held their annual general shareholder meetings (AGMs) between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2019, and that were in the Russell 3000 index as of January 2019. Unless specifically noted, the report examines data compiled […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Boards of Directors, Diversity, Engagement, ESG, Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Sustainability
Comments Off on Proxy Voting Analytics (2016-2019) and 2020 Season Preview
Mutual Fund Borrowing Poses Risk to Investors
Millions of Americans rely on mutual fund investments to pay for their retirement, but mutual funds contain hidden, previously under-appreciated risks. Our new study, forthcoming in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, provides evidence that mutual funds borrow in an attempt to improve their performance. But those attempts not only fail to boost average returns, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Derivatives, Institutional Investors
Tagged Capital structure, Debt, Derivatives, Institutional Investors, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage, Mutual funds, Risk
Comments Off on Mutual Fund Borrowing Poses Risk to Investors
Undressing the No-Vote Fee
A break-up fee payable by a public target company associated with a competing proposal is a near universal feature of public company sales. The fee is typically payable if the target exercises a fiduciary termination right to accept a superior proposal or in a “tail” situation where a competing proposal is completed during a set […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Acquisition agreements, Break fees, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder voting, Target firms, Termination, Termination fees
Comments Off on Undressing the No-Vote Fee
The Group Pleading Doctrine Following Janus
The “group pleading doctrine” has long been a tool employed in class action securities litigation by plaintiffs seeking to name corporate officers who are otherwise not alleged to have directly made any of the challenged statements. It is widely known that the viability of the doctrine was questioned in the wake of 1995 enactment of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Class actions, Janus Capital v. Traders, Pleading standards, PSLRA, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts
Comments Off on The Group Pleading Doctrine Following Janus
SEC Proposed Proxy Rules Changes—A Risk to Companies, Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability
When the Supreme Court eased limits on corporate spending for politics a decade ago, it nonetheless underscored important principles of corporate democracy and political disclosure. Almost a decade since Citizens United, however, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is pressing forward with proposed rules changes that would diminish a pillar of corporate democracy and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accountability, Citizens United v. FEC, Disclosure, Ownership, Political spending, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder rights, Transparency
Comments Off on SEC Proposed Proxy Rules Changes—A Risk to Companies, Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability
Automating Securities Class Action Settlements
Securities class actions, like nearly all class actions in the United States, are ostensibly opt-out lawsuits. Under the opt-out model, individuals who fall within the class definition are automatically members of the class unless they take affirmative steps to opt out. This model is meant to ensure that individuals who do not have the financial […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Institutional Investors, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Class actions, Financial technology, Institutional Investors, SEC, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Settlements, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on Automating Securities Class Action Settlements