-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Running the Risks: How Corporate Boards Can Oversee Environmental, Social And Governance Issues
As the risks from environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues such as climate change, water scarcity and human rights become more apparent, and with growing investor attention and action on ESG issues, it is increasingly important for corporate boards to understand how these issues affect business strategy and performance. Impacts from these issues can be […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Climate change, Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Proxy disclosure, Risk, Risk management, Risk oversight, Sustainability
1 Comment
Robovoting and Proxy Vote Disclosure
Introduction Recent research has estimated that the recommendations of proxy advisory firms dictate as much as 25 percent of proxy voting outcomes, with the potential to particularly impact smaller companies. As concern over the power of proxy advisors has led the SEC to consider additional regulation, proxy advisors have suggested that such concerns are unfounded. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Securities Regulation
Tagged Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Investment advisers, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Robovoting and Proxy Vote Disclosure
Form 20-F for Fiscal Year 2019: What Foreign Private Issuers Should Keep in Mind
There have been significant recent developments in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulation of foreign private issuers, (FPIs) including changes that impact the annual report on Form 20-F for fiscal year 2019. Below we discuss some of the recent highlights, as well as recent rulemaking activity by the SEC, the New York Stock Exchange […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Brexit, Cybersecurity, Disclosure, International governance, LIBOR, NASDAQ, NYSE, Regulation S-K, Risk oversight, SEC, Securities regulation, Sustainability
Comments Off on Form 20-F for Fiscal Year 2019: What Foreign Private Issuers Should Keep in Mind
The SEC’s Evolving Views Regarding Proxy Advisors
Executive Summary On August 21, 2019, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued new guidance regarding the role of proxy advisors in the proxy voting process. This guidance is expected to play an important role in the upcoming 2020 proxy season, as the Commission further defines the voting obligations of registered investment advisors […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on The SEC’s Evolving Views Regarding Proxy Advisors
CEO and Executive Compensation Practices: 2019 Edition
The Conference Board recently released CEO and Executive Compensation Practices: 2019 Edition, which documents trends and developments on senior management compensation at companies issuing equity securities registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and, as of May 2019, included in the Russell 3000 Index. The report has been designed to reflect the changing […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Compensation committees, Compensation disclosure, Engagement, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Long-Term value, Pay for performance, Peer groups, Surveys
Comments Off on CEO and Executive Compensation Practices: 2019 Edition
The Roundtable’s Stakeholderism Rhetoric is Empty, Thankfully
This summer, the Business Roundtable released an updated “Statement on the Purpose of the Corporation” that disavows the Roundtable’s longstanding endorsement of shareholder primacy—the notion that corporations should principally serve shareholders. The Statement changes precisely nothing. But that’s a good thing. Firms and the broader economy would suffer if CEOs could unilaterally disempower shareholders. The […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, HLS Research
Tagged Boards of Directors, Business Roundtable, Capital formation, Capital markets, Corporate Social Responsibility, Fiduciary duties, Management, Public firms, Shareholder primacy, Shareholder rights, Shareholder value, Stakeholders
1 Comment
Delaware Dismissal of Excessive Director Pay Case
On October 30, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery struck a major blow against the plaintiffs’ bar’s efforts to lower the statutory hurdle to maintaining stockholder derivative claims. A stockholder of Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. claimed that the company’s board of directors had awarded its non-employee directors excessive pay. Under applicable Delaware law, a stockholder asserting […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Derivative suits, Executive Compensation, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on Delaware Dismissal of Excessive Director Pay Case
Weekly Roundup: November 15–21, 2019
Recent Cyber Attacks Target Asset Management Firms Posted by Jeannie S. Rhee, Udi Grofman and Jeh Charles Johnson, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Friday, November 15, 2019 Tags: Asset management, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Cybersecurity, Disclosure, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Risk, Risk management, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement Overboarding by Public Company Directors: 2019 Update Posted by Steven Haas and Lawton Way, Hunton Andrews […]
Click here to read the complete postRegulation by Selective Enforcement: The SEC and Initial Coin Offerings
Critics of the SEC have claimed that at times it has engaged in “Regulation by Enforcement,” where it makes law through enforcement actions rather than by developing and passing clear rules. This argument has periodically surfaced with respect to some of the most important issues addressed by the SEC over the decades—insider trading, questionable foreign […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Financial technology, Howey test, ICOs, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Regulation by Selective Enforcement: The SEC and Initial Coin Offerings